Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could have foreseen that going to a payment optional system would lead to this?
Metro's budget shortfall has nothing to do with this and you know it.
I do think that general lawlessness (which is encouraged by allowing fare evasion) is a huge reason many don’t want to use metro.
Anonymous wrote:Who could have foreseen that going to a payment optional system would lead to this?
Anonymous wrote:
I do think that general lawlessness (which is encouraged by allowing fare evasion) is a huge reason many don’t want to use metro.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could have foreseen that going to a payment optional system would lead to this?
Metro's budget shortfall has nothing to do with this and you know it.
I do think that general lawlessness (which is encouraged by allowing fare evasion) is a huge reason many don’t want to use metro.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could have foreseen that going to a payment optional system would lead to this?
Metro's budget shortfall has nothing to do with this and you know it.
Anonymous wrote:Who could have foreseen that going to a payment optional system would lead to this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who could have foreseen that going to a payment optional system would lead to this?
Or we could decide that public transportation is a public good that should be funded by taxpayers in general, not just users. Like we treat streets -- we all pay for them, not just drivers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are not paying attention to Ubers price increases. Short trips used to run under $10. Now they are all $15 and up.
Which is still cheaper than the metro when traveling with multiple people. And even when Uber is more expensive, the difference is still negligible compared to metro. I’ll pay a few dollars extra to be more safe.
OK, y'all, we can get rid of WMATA now. PP personally would rather take Uber, even if it costs more. Problem solved!
It's not just PP. Ridership has cratered
Peak-hour commuting Metrorail ridership is down, unsurprisingly, given work from home. So now we don't need Metro trains or buses anymore? Is that what you're saying?
MD and VA fund metro as commuter rail. If it’s not used by commuters, then there is no reason for MD and VA to fund it at the same levels
That's silly. MD and VA fund Metro as regional transportation, which it is.