Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no idea why you are surprised a kid who formerly got two 99% now gets a perfect score. Where is the news other than what may be a slight surprise on your part?
Well it was years ago, so I really haven't given much thought to her scores in quite a while. And even though she scored 99 percentile, she could have still scored quite a few points below the max. Seeing her get the max score was really quite a bit more than a slight surprise, I was actually rather astounded by it
I have no idea why this would astound you. My kid scored very high on the cogat and Wisc. You had no idea with 2- 99% scores, admission into the gifted program, and presumably years of success in that program and you are astounded that the kid got a perfect score on an abilities test?
Yeah. To me a 160 seems like it's Einsteinian level smart, and while it's pretty obvious to me that DD is very smart, she spends most of her free time texting friends, making tik toks, and watching James Charles makeup tutorials. She doesn't seem to be on the path for curing cancer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no idea why you are surprised a kid who formerly got two 99% now gets a perfect score. Where is the news other than what may be a slight surprise on your part?
Well it was years ago, so I really haven't given much thought to her scores in quite a while. And even though she scored 99 percentile, she could have still scored quite a few points below the max. Seeing her get the max score was really quite a bit more than a slight surprise, I was actually rather astounded by it
I have no idea why this would astound you. My kid scored very high on the cogat and Wisc. You had no idea with 2- 99% scores, admission into the gifted program, and presumably years of success in that program and you are astounded that the kid got a perfect score on an abilities test?
Yeah. To me a 160 seems like it's Einsteinian level smart, and while it's pretty obvious to me that DD is very smart, she spends most of her free time texting friends, making tik toks, and watching James Charles makeup tutorials. She doesn't seem to be on the path for curing cancer.
Anonymous wrote:OP, just to give you another perspective. I know a 4th grader who got a 154 on the NNAT in 1st grade. It isn’t a 160, but damn close. The parent was thrilled and talked about it constantly. That child went on to get a 118 on the CogAT in 2nd grade and did not get o to the AAP program in FCPS. Parents decided to get a WISC to appeal and spoke of it frequently leading up to it. The child took the IQ test and nobody ever heard another word about it and the child did not get into AAP, nor did they try again for 4th grade entry to my knowledge. The conclusion I draw is that the child’s IQ was not terribly high. Just sayin’.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have no idea why you are surprised a kid who formerly got two 99% now gets a perfect score. Where is the news other than what may be a slight surprise on your part?
Well it was years ago, so I really haven't given much thought to her scores in quite a while. And even though she scored 99 percentile, she could have still scored quite a few points below the max. Seeing her get the max score was really quite a bit more than a slight surprise, I was actually rather astounded by it
I have no idea why this would astound you. My kid scored very high on the cogat and Wisc. You had no idea with 2- 99% scores, admission into the gifted program, and presumably years of success in that program and you are astounded that the kid got a perfect score on an abilities test?
Yeah. To me a 160 seems like it's Einsteinian level smart, and while it's pretty obvious to me that DD is very smart, she spends most of her free time texting friends, making tik toks, and watching James Charles makeup tutorials. She doesn't seem to be on the path for curing cancer.
Anonymous wrote:160 is a true genius. Nobody gets 160 out of 160 easily. It requires both natural and highly prepared brain at the moment in time. Plus she would need to be born between May and Aug. Younger in her spectrum. My childhood friends who scored very high scores in similar tests are equally successful now. Haters will always hate true genius and seek excuses but a perfect score is never easy.
Anonymous wrote:I'm still confused by why they'd take the Naglieri in 9th grade. It's not a particularly good screener, and it's only testing a very narrow range of abilities. Almost any test out there would be more informative for 9th graders than the Naglieri.
Anonymous wrote:A 160 Naglieri doesn’t suggest a 160 IQ or even a 140 IQ. The Naglieri is a brief, multiple choice screener that tests nonverbal skills. It also has a reputation for disproportionately many high scores. Your kid is smart, but stop being ridiculous. If you’re getting that wrapped up in scores, then get a real IQ test.
Anonymous wrote:I'm still confused by why they'd take the Naglieri in 9th grade. It's not a particularly good screener, and it's only testing a very narrow range of abilities. Almost any test out there would be more informative for 9th graders than the Naglieri.