Anonymous
08/02/2014 10:02
Subject: separation/divorce, custody & fairness
This is absurd. Child support is based on income. He makes more, so he pays more. That's just fair. Also, you stayed home to allow him to work. You should at the very least ask for alimony for the amount of years that you stayed home, so you can get back on your feet with your own education and career. Any less and you are short hanging yourself and your kids.
As for visitation, it is his responsibility to find a suitable home for his children, not yours. He can afford more than a 1 bedroom on his income. That's ridiculous.
As for visitation, it is his responsibility to find a suitable home for his children, not yours. He can afford more than a 1 bedroom on his income. That's ridiculous.
Anonymous
08/01/2014 20:11
Subject: separation/divorce, custody & fairness
Anonymous wrote:I can't he stay with the kids in their home for visitation?
As far as daytimes? No problem. Are you suggesting I leave my own home for him to stay here with them at night?
Anonymous
08/01/2014 20:10
Subject: Re:separation/divorce, custody & fairness
Anonymous wrote:Why would the expenses be split 50/50 when you don't make the same amount of money?
I agree. He feels that they're half mine, thus... 50/50. That he shouldn't be "punished" for making more. Something about socialism, blahblah.
Anonymous
08/01/2014 12:50
Subject: separation/divorce, custody & fairness
Anonymous
08/01/2014 12:50
Subject: separation/divorce, custody & fairness
I know of a couple who exchanges tax returns. 50/50 custody. all expenses split by a ratio of income.
Anonymous
07/29/2014 21:12
Subject: Re:separation/divorce, custody & fairness
Why would the expenses be split 50/50 when you don't make the same amount of money?
Anonymous
07/29/2014 16:00
Subject: separation/divorce, custody & fairness
I can't he stay with the kids in their home for visitation?
Anonymous
07/25/2014 20:51
Subject: Re:separation/divorce, custody & fairness
The best investment you can make with your savings is to get child support now, while you can afford an attorney. If you spend that savings now, trying to protect your XH's "feelings," you will find it very difficult to take him to court later (you won't have the retainer, etc.)
What you describe sounds sustainable NOW, but will it be in the 3 years? Since your children will still be very much your responsibility still in 3 years, I'd focus on the child support in writing as an insurance plan for the sake of your kids.
As an aside, I think a lot of men feel it's "unfair" to pay child support when they don't have the kids most or a lot of the time. Of course the women who are being always "on call" and the ones monitoring homework each night and picking up the kids from games/friends/lessons/school, also feel it's "unfair" that they are only getting 50% of their children's expenses while doing some 90% (or more) of the childrearing work. I say that not to validate his feelings but to point out that "fairness" is not a good measure... I'd recommend thinking about "what's best for our kids?" as a better standard.
What you describe sounds sustainable NOW, but will it be in the 3 years? Since your children will still be very much your responsibility still in 3 years, I'd focus on the child support in writing as an insurance plan for the sake of your kids.
As an aside, I think a lot of men feel it's "unfair" to pay child support when they don't have the kids most or a lot of the time. Of course the women who are being always "on call" and the ones monitoring homework each night and picking up the kids from games/friends/lessons/school, also feel it's "unfair" that they are only getting 50% of their children's expenses while doing some 90% (or more) of the childrearing work. I say that not to validate his feelings but to point out that "fairness" is not a good measure... I'd recommend thinking about "what's best for our kids?" as a better standard.