Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs a competitive application to begin with…after that, these things absolutely make a difference.
This. A daughter's friend who was extremely academically weak, no honors/AP classes, 1200 SAT after prep, etc. basically said she was going to go to Bates College because her uncle was a board member and major donor. That did not work out. I would assume that if she had been somewhere in the ballpark for that school in the first place she would have been admitted.
đź’Ż agree with this.
Feel like these kinds of things give rich families the +1 rating that URM or 1G status gives to those applicants.
They are all on the border/cusp and are actually competitive applicants - in the 25-75% distro - but the special designation (URM; recruit; 1G; board letters) makes some sort of difference in the final scoring.
So is it all about that +1 rating? To make sure the kid’s application is read by the full admissions team, as someone on this board implied in another thread?
If so, you’d think CCO of private high schools would have told all their parents to do this and other shady things? Or is this the unspoken part?
Yes, if slightly oversimplified.
And no one is telling us to get these letters.
Come back and tell us if it works.
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure that's how I got into college. I graduated from RMIB so I would say I had the academic ability. But really I was just one of hundred kids there and nothing about me was special.
My mom was a nurse in nursing home. Over the years, I would go hang out with the residents on my moms floor. I had no idea who any of them were. I would also talk to the families when they visited. As I moved into Sr. year, a family member asked me where I was planning to apply. He happened to be on the board of one of the schools I was applying to. He wrote me a letter of recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs a competitive application to begin with…after that, these things absolutely make a difference.
This. A daughter's friend who was extremely academically weak, no honors/AP classes, 1200 SAT after prep, etc. basically said she was going to go to Bates College because her uncle was a board member and major donor. That did not work out. I would assume that if she had been somewhere in the ballpark for that school in the first place she would have been admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if people saw this posted in snother thread:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/75/1187936.page
8 different board members wrote your kid a letter for 8 diff schools?
+++++++++++++++
Yes and we somewhat embarrassed by it but this is a very unusual year. And we scrambled in Dec and Jan to get this done.
Non-DMV private.
Getting the college application read and evaluated has became critical.
Kid has scores and stats but have been told by private college counselor it’s about using any and all cards available this year. The influx of applications means most apps get a brief pre-read by the $15/hr pre-readers and 70%+ don’t make it to the next level.
Key is making sure app gets to committee. That requires letters of support - from various board members or large donors - which guarantees app is read by most senior AO.
What kind of colleges are these? Major?
How do you know the letters will help you or that they are even going to make a difference? Or is it more like another reference /rec letter?
Did your private college counselor recommend? How many people do something like this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs a competitive application to begin with…after that, these things absolutely make a difference.
This. A daughter's friend who was extremely academically weak, no honors/AP classes, 1200 SAT after prep, etc. basically said she was going to go to Bates College because her uncle was a board member and major donor. That did not work out. I would assume that if she had been somewhere in the ballpark for that school in the first place she would have been admitted.
đź’Ż agree with this.
Feel like these kinds of things give rich families the +1 rating that URM or 1G status gives to those applicants.
They are all on the border/cusp and are actually competitive applicants - in the 25-75% distro - but the special designation (URM; recruit; 1G; board letters) makes some sort of difference in the final scoring.
So is it all about that +1 rating? To make sure the kid’s application is read by the full admissions team, as someone on this board implied in another thread?
If so, you’d think CCO of private high schools would have told all their parents to do this and other shady things? Or is this the unspoken part?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs a competitive application to begin with…after that, these things absolutely make a difference.
This. A daughter's friend who was extremely academically weak, no honors/AP classes, 1200 SAT after prep, etc. basically said she was going to go to Bates College because her uncle was a board member and major donor. That did not work out. I would assume that if she had been somewhere in the ballpark for that school in the first place she would have been admitted.
đź’Ż agree with this.
Feel like these kinds of things give rich families the +1 rating that URM or 1G status gives to those applicants.
They are all on the border/cusp and are actually competitive applicants - in the 25-75% distro - but the special designation (URM; recruit; 1G; board letters) makes some sort of difference in the final scoring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs a competitive application to begin with…after that, these things absolutely make a difference.
This. A daughter's friend who was extremely academically weak, no honors/AP classes, 1200 SAT after prep, etc. basically said she was going to go to Bates College because her uncle was a board member and major donor. That did not work out. I would assume that if she had been somewhere in the ballpark for that school in the first place she would have been admitted.
Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs a competitive application to begin with…after that, these things absolutely make a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if people saw this posted in snother thread:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/75/1187936.page
8 different board members wrote your kid a letter for 8 diff schools?
+++++++++++++++
Yes and we somewhat embarrassed by it but this is a very unusual year. And we scrambled in Dec and Jan to get this done.
Non-DMV private.
Getting the college application read and evaluated has became critical.
Kid has scores and stats but have been told by private college counselor it’s about using any and all cards available this year. The influx of applications means most apps get a brief pre-read by the $15/hr pre-readers and 70%+ don’t make it to the next level.
Key is making sure app gets to committee. That requires letters of support - from various board members or large donors - which guarantees app is read by most senior AO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of multiple situations where applicants got board /influential donors’ (named buildings) letters to submit in “support of their application”.
Both public and private colleges & universities.
In the cases of OOS flagships, it’s worked at Mich/Wisc/UT/UVA this year - all OOS and all applicants I personally know (or my kid knows).
Also, know of kids who got similar board “letters of support” at Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Yale and Barnard this year. All ED/EA/REA kids - all admitted.
Yes, we are at a private school. Small classes = Kids talk.
Is this practice really that common? Does everyone mine their network to get this done? Does this happen every year or only this one bc it’s so unpredictable ?? Does it work for RD too or only EA/ED etc…
Counselors please weigh in as well.
Not surprising esp for private school kids. All about money and connections. Scary when these kids have to do something on their own.
They won't need to - their parents will have enough connections to get them a job somewhere.
But that’s always been true. Story as old as time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of multiple situations where applicants got board /influential donors’ (named buildings) letters to submit in “support of their application”.
Both public and private colleges & universities.
In the cases of OOS flagships, it’s worked at Mich/Wisc/UT/UVA this year - all OOS and all applicants I personally know (or my kid knows).
Also, know of kids who got similar board “letters of support” at Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Yale and Barnard this year. All ED/EA/REA kids - all admitted.
Yes, we are at a private school. Small classes = Kids talk.
Is this practice really that common? Does everyone mine their network to get this done? Does this happen every year or only this one bc it’s so unpredictable ?? Does it work for RD too or only EA/ED etc…
Counselors please weigh in as well.
Not surprising esp for private school kids. All about money and connections. Scary when these kids have to do something on their own.
They won't need to - their parents will have enough connections to get them a job somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearing of multiple situations where applicants got board /influential donors’ (named buildings) letters to submit in “support of their application”.
Both public and private colleges & universities.
In the cases of OOS flagships, it’s worked at Mich/Wisc/UT/UVA this year - all OOS and all applicants I personally know (or my kid knows).
Also, know of kids who got similar board “letters of support” at Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Yale and Barnard this year. All ED/EA/REA kids - all admitted.
Yes, we are at a private school. Small classes = Kids talk.
Is this practice really that common? Does everyone mine their network to get this done? Does this happen every year or only this one bc it’s so unpredictable ?? Does it work for RD too or only EA/ED etc…
Counselors please weigh in as well.
Not surprising esp for private school kids. All about money and connections. Scary when these kids have to do something on their own.