Anonymous wrote:If BOE and Taylor are not cognizant of the current economic outlook for the county that suggests some serious incompetence.

I know people have been contacting their county board reps about this already.

Anonymous wrote:Economic outlook is 100% on topic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FFS, now people are arguing that you should be fine with BOTH losing your job and your home value tanking. And if you don't it's all your fault.

What the hell is wrong with people.

I don't think anyone is saying this. I think people should be prepared for these things. Both happen frequently to many families at the same time. Widespread job losses are often the reason why home values go down. If you are worried about the impact of a potential downturn in property values on your personal finances, I suggest you speak with a financial advisor. It may be a good idea for you to build up an emergency fund/change the distribution of your portfolio to include less risky and more liquid assets. What I do not think is helpful is advocating for segregation in our schools to protect your home value.

Anonymous wrote:Go back to Strategic plan. A version of option 3 is what is going to happen. They want all students to reach certain goals and there was a comment about the “W” schools and how all schoola should be considered good and that can only happen with desegregation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FFS, now people are arguing that you should be fine with BOTH losing your job and your home value tanking. And if you don't it's all your fault.

What the hell is wrong with people.

I don't think anyone is saying this. I think people should be prepared for these things. Both happen frequently to many families at the same time. Widespread job losses are often the reason why home values go down. If you are worried about the impact of a potential downturn in property values on your personal finances, I suggest you speak with a financial advisor. It may be a good idea for you to build up an emergency fund/change the distribution of your portfolio to include less risky and more liquid assets. What I do not think is helpful is advocating for segregation in our schools to protect your home value.

I see this word gets thrown casually. I am genuunly ionterested where is segregation where some one is not allowed to buy and attend near by schools?

If by segregation, you mean why poor kids are not attending some rich schools far away then it's a poor arguement to make for segregation.

People will buy where they can afford and go to school close to their house. That's how it has worked due to being most efficient use of tax payers money. That's not segregation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FFS, now people are arguing that you should be fine with BOTH losing your job and your home value tanking. And if you don't it's all your fault.

What the hell is wrong with people.

I don't think anyone is saying this. I think people should be prepared for these things. Both happen frequently to many families at the same time. Widespread job losses are often the reason why home values go down. If you are worried about the impact of a potential downturn in property values on your personal finances, I suggest you speak with a financial advisor. It may be a good idea for you to build up an emergency fund/change the distribution of your portfolio to include less risky and more liquid assets. What I do not think is helpful is advocating for segregation in our schools to protect your home value.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can see both sides of the conversation. Yes, we absolutely need more diversity in our schools—there’s no doubt about that. However, as someone who has sent my son to high-FARMS (Free and Reduced Meals) schools in the past, I have to be honest about what I experienced. Whether those students looked like me or not, there was often a noticeable disregard for others. Fights, verbal altercations, and stealing were common. This was in the 2000s, mind you.

Eventually, I pulled him out and enrolled him in private school. Later, I bought a home in Olney, and my second child attended public schools there and did just fine.

I saw a comment recently suggesting that students on FARMS should be allowed to attend W schools—sort of like a magnet model. I actually think that’s a smart solution. It would increase diversity without bringing the very issues that drove people to move to places like Bethesda, Chevy Chase, or certain areas of Rockville in the first place.

Is it your assertion that all the kids from low-income families had a disregard for others? Or that a higher percentage of them do?

I’m not saying all kids from low-income families behave that way—but there are definitely risk factors we shouldn’t ignore or deny. Poverty brings stress, instability, and sometimes exposure to environments where conflict is normalized. That doesn’t mean every child will act out, but it does mean that schools with higher concentrations of those challenges often deal with more behavioral issues.

That said, yes—FARMS rates do need to be higher in our more affluent schools. That’s exactly why I mentioned that comment about creating a magnet-style program to bring FARMS students into W schools. It’s a way to increase diversity meaningfully, without replicating the same issues that led families—mine included—to seek out places like Olney, Bethesda, or Chevy Chase in the first place. We can aim for inclusion and support while also being realistic about what works.

Neglect, child abuse, violence and lack of supervision are also common in wealthy families, it’s just hidden better. The dcc kids don’t want to be bussed to your school. You don’t want inclusion and diversity, let’s be real.

My kid would, he hates his school, and I can’t afford private.

Anonymous wrote:FFS, now people are arguing that you should be fine with BOTH losing your job and your home value tanking. And if you don't it's all your fault.

What the hell is wrong with people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:was Farmland specifically redlined, while other parts of Rockville were not?

I don’t think we have houses here that are that old. Plus lots of apartments.

regardless of whether the community was actually redlined to keep black people from owning homes there, the property values should go down because of historical racism everywhere.

Says who? Last I checked Gov Moore vetoed reparations.

BOE and Taylor. That's why they have Option 3.

That is clearly not their job.

their job is to solve systemic racism and fight capitalism.

I’m assuming you’re being sarcastic.

the contention of many on this thread is that their role is to better integrate schools (fight racism), with a side benefit of wealth transfer from richer to poorer areas (fight capitalism). Why else would they promulgate Option 3?