Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what jurisdiction are you in? Often times a victim of domestic violence can show a landlord a restraining order and the landlord is obliged to end the lease and let the victim move out without seizing the deposit as rent forgone. But, check your jurisdiction.
I would be concerned that the reality of your situation is that a neighbor who chooses to violate the restraining order can move to harm you in less time than it will take the police to respond to a 911 call. RN, he's just talking to you, but it's entirely unpredictable whether one day he'll just show up with a gun.
Read up on the Violence Against Women Act [VAWA].
If you are renting, your landlord is obligated to allow you to move to another unit of your choosing (if that is what you want to do vs. moving altogether.)
Because not everyone wants to move or can afford to upend their homes because of a douchebag ex slash stalker.
At least that way this person does not know where you live at.
But he lives in the complex, knows what car she drives and where she works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what jurisdiction are you in? Often times a victim of domestic violence can show a landlord a restraining order and the landlord is obliged to end the lease and let the victim move out without seizing the deposit as rent forgone. But, check your jurisdiction.
I would be concerned that the reality of your situation is that a neighbor who chooses to violate the restraining order can move to harm you in less time than it will take the police to respond to a 911 call. RN, he's just talking to you, but it's entirely unpredictable whether one day he'll just show up with a gun.
Read up on the Violence Against Women Act [VAWA].
If you are renting, your landlord is obligated to allow you to move to another unit of your choosing (if that is what you want to do vs. moving altogether.)
Because not everyone wants to move or can afford to upend their homes because of a douchebag ex slash stalker.
At least that way this person does not know where you live at.
Anonymous wrote:OP, what jurisdiction are you in? Often times a victim of domestic violence can show a landlord a restraining order and the landlord is obliged to end the lease and let the victim move out without seizing the deposit as rent forgone. But, check your jurisdiction.
I would be concerned that the reality of your situation is that a neighbor who chooses to violate the restraining order can move to harm you in less time than it will take the police to respond to a 911 call. RN, he's just talking to you, but it's entirely unpredictable whether one day he'll just show up with a gun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read something recently, something like restraining orders are the police telling men "Better luck killing her next time". They don't do shit.
+1. The male cops identify more with the male offender than the female victim.
Anonymous wrote:OP, what jurisdiction are you in? Often times a victim of domestic violence can show a landlord a restraining order and the landlord is obliged to end the lease and let the victim move out without seizing the deposit as rent forgone. But, check your jurisdiction.
I would be concerned that the reality of your situation is that a neighbor who chooses to violate the restraining order can move to harm you in less time than it will take the police to respond to a 911 call. RN, he's just talking to you, but it's entirely unpredictable whether one day he'll just show up with a gun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need a lawyer nof the police. He needs to be take to court for violating the order.
Does he respect the law? Doesn't sound like it. With these guys, it's about control. The TRO just infuriates them.
Guys violating court orders don't make judges very happy. They sometimes tell guys with guns to go put the tough guys in jail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I assume the order says he can't come near your condo. It doesn't say he can't check his mail.
The issue is not that the guy is at the mailbox checking his mail.
When someone has a restraining order against them, they are in clear violation of that order if they initiate contact with the person who has it against them.
So initiating a conversation with the victim is a clear violation of the order.
As most agree here - restraining orders are really useless since the law is soft when it comes to authorities enforcing it in the end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You need a lawyer nof the police. He needs to be take to court for violating the order.
Does he respect the law? Doesn't sound like it. With these guys, it's about control. The TRO just infuriates them.
Anonymous wrote:I assume the order says he can't come near your condo. It doesn't say he can't check his mail.
Anonymous wrote:You need a lawyer nof the police. He needs to be take to court for violating the order.
Anonymous wrote:I read something recently, something like restraining orders are the police telling men "Better luck killing her next time". They don't do shit.