Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whitman is probably the wealthiest school in an already wealthy county. For that reason, they have been vilified and guilted into taking various low income, disruptive students. Because why should well-off kids from nice backgrounds be able to live peacefully huh? They should be forced to live in terror too.
Now you see the end result of supposedly "compassionate" programs. It's really just score settling and old vendettas come to life. Resentment for the achieving and functional class and punishment for their children.
If Whitman parents dont do something about this they should be absolutely ashamed of themselves.
So.. where should those kids be sent to? Anywhere other than Whitman? NIMBY at its finest.
How about a school in their own neighborhood? With kids from a similar background who are used to dealing with this particular brand of BS
You can always count on Whitman parents to come through with three arguments:
1) We aren't THAT rich. We're practically poor by Saudi standards.
2) All problems at Whitman are the fault of the "the group home"
3) Whitman families should be able to "buy out" of dealing with kids who have experienced trauma
To your 3)

:
no not just Whitman families, all families feel that way
Apparently that's not the view of the poster who said kids should go back to their own neighborhoods where the other kids know how to deal with them...
Parents needs to teach their kids how to physically defend themselves.
It shouldn’t be that way, but it is. Teach your kid to throw a punch so they’ll be ready. If the school won’t protect them, parents have to.
It’s utter BS that all of “those kids” in those poor DCC schools are used to violence and know how to fight, but PP who said that BS already knew that and just wanted to be a dumb troll.