Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, complete faith. She offers the polar opposite of the GOP ticket.
She proved at the convention she’s a policy expert and an amazing public speaker.
Joke right?
What policy is she an expert of?
And she can read of a teleprompter. She is horrible when actually answering questions about policy or basically anything else…. She has proven that with 3 years of horrible interviews and responses that don’t make sense. Just google it.
Anonymous wrote:Amazing people want to stimulate demand for homes when demand isn’t even close to the problem. The problem is supply. And they think a good solution is granting people more money to push prices higher. I live in an insane asylum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused and enraged at this continuous double standard- not just on here but with the media. Kamala can’t give stump speeches and has to be incredibly definitive on every single policy and Trump does not have to be? Nobody asks him to outline in coherent sentences his policies. If people can’t look on the websites but rather demand a verbal explanation in interviews or in speeches from Kamala then they should have that same exacting standard for Trump and pin him down to actually answer in a damn understandable and coherent way.
Because we fuel them by providing sources, facts, and truth. We have to stop because as one poster stated, “The truth is irrelevant.” Page 5 22:47 https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/30/1220914.page#28088608
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s so telling that when a democrat insists Kamala had policy positions online and no one can find them, someone starts ranting about abortion/Roe v Wade.
Concern trolls keep concerning. You don't actually care about her policies or her positions. Trump literally didn't have a platform in 2020 (it was a rehash of the 2016 platform) and has shown with his current "policies" that he has no follow through on how to implement these. The funny thing, policy positions only matter to the informed and educated, which would exclude 98% of MAGA voters. Those who are educated and informed openly despise what Trump, Project 2025 and the GOP presently stands for -- rendering the publishing of any policy position by Harris moot. Most voters identify with and vibe with the candidate, not the policies. But you knew that, didn't you?
So you don’t know where to find the policies on her website either?
+1
Where is KH’s policy positions? The only information on the website is her background and multiple links to donate money.
Off the top of my head:
* Cap insulin costs at $35
* $2k cap on prescription costs
* Expand child tax credit to $3,600 per child, $6k credit for parents of newborns
* $25k down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers
Those are goodies for voters. These are easy. What about the hard issues?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, complete faith. She offers the polar opposite of the GOP ticket.
She proved at the convention she’s a policy expert and an amazing public speaker.
Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused and enraged at this continuous double standard- not just on here but with the media. Kamala can’t give stump speeches and has to be incredibly definitive on every single policy and Trump does not have to be? Nobody asks him to outline in coherent sentences his policies. If people can’t look on the websites but rather demand a verbal explanation in interviews or in speeches from Kamala then they should have that same exacting standard for Trump and pin him down to actually answer in a damn understandable and coherent way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She would be in a better position if she had an earlier debate scheduled.
Kennedy and Trump is all you’ll hear about until a debate.
Debate is in two weeks. And Kennedy positive buzz will last as long as JD Vance’s did. Because “a worm at my brain and I put a dead bear in Central Park” is weirder than even couch humping. Incels understand couch humping. No one understands brain worms and putting dead animals in public parks.
You actually think most Americans listen to this shit? They care about policy, what is Kamala’s policy?
Anyone
Anyone
Many Americans care about debate performance. It is a good stress test for the candidates. Last one had both candidates struggling. One withdrew and one is going to try to debate again and struggle against Harris
Hilary Clinton won her debates again Trump. So did Kerry vs. Bush. Even Obama lost his first debate to Romney. Debates matter a lot less than people think. They only matter if they're a total disaster and when the candidate already is facing questions about age as Biden was.
Democrats: Trump is shaking in his lifts thinking about debating Biden! He is so terrified he won’t show up! The orange coward will never debate Biden!
Also democrats: meh. debate, schemate. Who cares about policy/debates, anyway. 🐝🎤💃🏽
Who keeps trying to wriggle out or change the terms of the upcoming debate? It ain't Harris.
Change/wriggle out? Trump proposed more debates, which Harris refused to do.
Now dems are saying debates don’t even matter.
He’s being an utter foot stamping child in trying to control and change the date, location, time. He’ll only do it if he feels like it’s totally on his terms. He’s not leadership material, has no concept of others, compromise - ETHICS.
Umm... didn't Trump give Biden exactly the types of debates that Biden wanted - and still beat him?
Also, if Kamala isn't afraid of Trump, why not do a FOX debate? That would seem to be exactly what Trump gave Biden - choice of channel, format, etc....
+1
He did.
He didn't "beat" Biden. He projected confidence and mostly rambled through a bunch of word salads. That's what Trump always does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She would be in a better position if she had an earlier debate scheduled.
Kennedy and Trump is all you’ll hear about until a debate.
Debate is in two weeks. And Kennedy positive buzz will last as long as JD Vance’s did. Because “a worm at my brain and I put a dead bear in Central Park” is weirder than even couch humping. Incels understand couch humping. No one understands brain worms and putting dead animals in public parks.
You actually think most Americans listen to this shit? They care about policy, what is Kamala’s policy?
Anyone
Anyone
Many Americans care about debate performance. It is a good stress test for the candidates. Last one had both candidates struggling. One withdrew and one is going to try to debate again and struggle against Harris
Hilary Clinton won her debates again Trump. So did Kerry vs. Bush. Even Obama lost his first debate to Romney. Debates matter a lot less than people think. They only matter if they're a total disaster and when the candidate already is facing questions about age as Biden was.
Democrats: Trump is shaking in his lifts thinking about debating Biden! He is so terrified he won’t show up! The orange coward will never debate Biden!
Also democrats: meh. debate, schemate. Who cares about policy/debates, anyway. 🐝🎤💃🏽
Who keeps trying to wriggle out or change the terms of the upcoming debate? It ain't Harris.
Change/wriggle out? Trump proposed more debates, which Harris refused to do.
Now dems are saying debates don’t even matter.
He’s being an utter foot stamping child in trying to control and change the date, location, time. He’ll only do it if he feels like it’s totally on his terms. He’s not leadership material, has no concept of others, compromise - ETHICS.
Umm... didn't Trump give Biden exactly the types of debates that Biden wanted - and still beat him?
Also, if Kamala isn't afraid of Trump, why not do a FOX debate? That would seem to be exactly what Trump gave Biden - choice of channel, format, etc....
+1
He did.
He didn't "beat" Biden. He projected confidence and mostly rambled through a bunch of word salads. That's what Trump always does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She would be in a better position if she had an earlier debate scheduled.
Kennedy and Trump is all you’ll hear about until a debate.
Debate is in two weeks. And Kennedy positive buzz will last as long as JD Vance’s did. Because “a worm at my brain and I put a dead bear in Central Park” is weirder than even couch humping. Incels understand couch humping. No one understands brain worms and putting dead animals in public parks.
You actually think most Americans listen to this shit? They care about policy, what is Kamala’s policy?
Anyone
Anyone
Many Americans care about debate performance. It is a good stress test for the candidates. Last one had both candidates struggling. One withdrew and one is going to try to debate again and struggle against Harris
Hilary Clinton won her debates again Trump. So did Kerry vs. Bush. Even Obama lost his first debate to Romney. Debates matter a lot less than people think. They only matter if they're a total disaster and when the candidate already is facing questions about age as Biden was.
Democrats: Trump is shaking in his lifts thinking about debating Biden! He is so terrified he won’t show up! The orange coward will never debate Biden!
Also democrats: meh. debate, schemate. Who cares about policy/debates, anyway. 🐝🎤💃🏽
Who keeps trying to wriggle out or change the terms of the upcoming debate? It ain't Harris.
Change/wriggle out? Trump proposed more debates, which Harris refused to do.
Now dems are saying debates don’t even matter.
He’s being an utter foot stamping child in trying to control and change the date, location, time. He’ll only do it if he feels like it’s totally on his terms. He’s not leadership material, has no concept of others, compromise - ETHICS.
Umm... didn't Trump give Biden exactly the types of debates that Biden wanted - and still beat him?
Also, if Kamala isn't afraid of Trump, why not do a FOX debate? That would seem to be exactly what Trump gave Biden - choice of channel, format, etc....
+1
He did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s so telling that when a democrat insists Kamala had policy positions online and no one can find them, someone starts ranting about abortion/Roe v Wade.
Concern trolls keep concerning. You don't actually care about her policies or her positions. Trump literally didn't have a platform in 2020 (it was a rehash of the 2016 platform) and has shown with his current "policies" that he has no follow through on how to implement these. The funny thing, policy positions only matter to the informed and educated, which would exclude 98% of MAGA voters. Those who are educated and informed openly despise what Trump, Project 2025 and the GOP presently stands for -- rendering the publishing of any policy position by Harris moot. Most voters identify with and vibe with the candidate, not the policies. But you knew that, didn't you?
So you don’t know where to find the policies on her website either?
+1
Where is KH’s policy positions? The only information on the website is her background and multiple links to donate money.
Calm down. She's been the presumptive nominee for just over a month. Feel free to look at the policies that the Biden administration implemented or defended in the meantime. You, of course, act like she's entirely removed from her current position as VP (you know, a heartbeat away from leading the current administration).
Biden has gotten us into this mess. She has to do better than that.
What mess? Inflation has stabilized to normal levels, the stock market is pushing 41,000. Divisiveness? Trump seeded that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She would be in a better position if she had an earlier debate scheduled.
Kennedy and Trump is all you’ll hear about until a debate.
Debate is in two weeks. And Kennedy positive buzz will last as long as JD Vance’s did. Because “a worm at my brain and I put a dead bear in Central Park” is weirder than even couch humping. Incels understand couch humping. No one understands brain worms and putting dead animals in public parks.
You actually think most Americans listen to this shit? They care about policy, what is Kamala’s policy?
Anyone
Anyone
Many Americans care about debate performance. It is a good stress test for the candidates. Last one had both candidates struggling. One withdrew and one is going to try to debate again and struggle against Harris
Hilary Clinton won her debates again Trump. So did Kerry vs. Bush. Even Obama lost his first debate to Romney. Debates matter a lot less than people think. They only matter if they're a total disaster and when the candidate already is facing questions about age as Biden was.
Democrats: Trump is shaking in his lifts thinking about debating Biden! He is so terrified he won’t show up! The orange coward will never debate Biden!
Also democrats: meh. debate, schemate. Who cares about policy/debates, anyway. 🐝🎤💃🏽
Who keeps trying to wriggle out or change the terms of the upcoming debate? It ain't Harris.
Change/wriggle out? Trump proposed more debates, which Harris refused to do.
Now dems are saying debates don’t even matter.
He’s being an utter foot stamping child in trying to control and change the date, location, time. He’ll only do it if he feels like it’s totally on his terms. He’s not leadership material, has no concept of others, compromise - ETHICS.
Umm... didn't Trump give Biden exactly the types of debates that Biden wanted - and still beat him?
Also, if Kamala isn't afraid of Trump, why not do a FOX debate? That would seem to be exactly what Trump gave Biden - choice of channel, format, etc....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She would be in a better position if she had an earlier debate scheduled.
Kennedy and Trump is all you’ll hear about until a debate.
Debate is in two weeks. And Kennedy positive buzz will last as long as JD Vance’s did. Because “a worm at my brain and I put a dead bear in Central Park” is weirder than even couch humping. Incels understand couch humping. No one understands brain worms and putting dead animals in public parks.
You actually think most Americans listen to this shit? They care about policy, what is Kamala’s policy?
Anyone
Anyone
Many Americans care about debate performance. It is a good stress test for the candidates. Last one had both candidates struggling. One withdrew and one is going to try to debate again and struggle against Harris
Hilary Clinton won her debates again Trump. So did Kerry vs. Bush. Even Obama lost his first debate to Romney. Debates matter a lot less than people think. They only matter if they're a total disaster and when the candidate already is facing questions about age as Biden was.
Democrats: Trump is shaking in his lifts thinking about debating Biden! He is so terrified he won’t show up! The orange coward will never debate Biden!
Also democrats: meh. debate, schemate. Who cares about policy/debates, anyway. 🐝🎤💃🏽
Who keeps trying to wriggle out or change the terms of the upcoming debate? It ain't Harris.
Change/wriggle out? Trump proposed more debates, which Harris refused to do.
Now dems are saying debates don’t even matter.
He’s being an utter foot stamping child in trying to control and change the date, location, time. He’ll only do it if he feels like it’s totally on his terms. He’s not leadership material, has no concept of others, compromise - ETHICS.
Umm... didn't Trump give Biden exactly the types of debates that Biden wanted - and still beat him?
Also, if Kamala isn't afraid of Trump, why not do a FOX debate? That would seem to be exactly what Trump gave Biden - choice of channel, format, etc....
Anonymous wrote:So my main question is since she is a staunch supporter of Israel, will she continue to send billions of dollars of aid to Israel for their retaliatory war against the citizens of Gaza?
I m disappointed honestly, even though it was expected. Posters here kept saying she was against the war in Gaza and would support the Palestinian citizens. Turns out it was all a lie.