Anonymous wrote:I actually didn't go to the open house and took a chance in the ranking… We are lucky to have been matched as they indicated that there were 1,000 people on the wait list. When the principal asked the parents in the crowd who had siblings already attending the school to stand, it felt like more than half. Honestly, I think you will be lucky to get in.
In terms of quality, the principal had a very warm demeanor. The teachers were engaging and were open to any questions after the orientation. It is structured using the montessori method (one-on-one teaching), but still with exams. I really respected how they strategically bring in the PK3 kids. On August 25th, all former students attend and then in September, they slowly bring in each PK3 student at different times so they don't feel overwhelmed.
In addition, the location right next to Union Station is great, it doesn't feel like it's on a major road or placed in a strange neighborhood surrounded by sketchy streets. It also looks like they built a brand new playground.
Looking forward to sending my son there!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
The person who started that thread did not name the school. I read the thread and saw no good reason to assume it was Logan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard that a kid's experience at the school is based on the teacher they get.
Isn't that the case with most schools?
I agree with this.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
The person who started that thread did not name the school. I read the thread and saw no good reason to assume it was Logan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
The person who started that thread did not name the school. I read the thread and saw no good reason to assume it was Logan.
Except for that it's DCPS and Montessori. I guess it could be Langdon.
Read the thread carefully. The poster said that the child's PRIOR school was Montessori -- not the school where the incident took place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
The person who started that thread did not name the school. I read the thread and saw no good reason to assume it was Logan.
Except for that it's DCPS and Montessori. I guess it could be Langdon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
The person who started that thread did not name the school. I read the thread and saw no good reason to assume it was Logan.
Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
Anonymous wrote:This is news to me. Can you link me to that thread? I can't find it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn't Logan the school that had that awful incident where a three-year-old was punished by making them sit alone in the cafeteria?
That is why it wasn't on my list for this year. I will never forget that thread on DCUM. I have heard that the principal is not good. He seems really focused on the expansion, but not necessarily on meeting the needs of the kids who are there. I have heard that a kid's experience at the school is based on the teacher they get.
Anonymous wrote:What is up with the abysmal test scores? I generally try to look beyond or inside of test scores to figure out what is really going on so I appreciate any insight from people with kids there. Is it simply that because of the Montessori approach the students don't know how to approach a paper and pencil test? Or are there real gaps in reading and math skills in 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th ( ? ) grade levels?
Should we expect the same less than stellar testing from SWS because of their non-traditional educational approach
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have heard that a kid's experience at the school is based on the teacher they get.
Isn't that the case with most schools?
I'm a former parent and I think it's a little of both.Anonymous wrote:What is up with the abysmal test scores? I generally try to look beyond or inside of test scores to figure out what is really going on so I appreciate any insight from people with kids there. Is it simply that because of the Montessori approach the students don't know how to approach a paper and pencil test? Or are there real gaps in reading and math skills in 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th ( ? ) grade levels?
Should we expect the same less than stellar testing from SWS because of their non-traditional educational approach