Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have seen it used at law school. Generally, where a student sucks up time and tries to impress the teacher with questions or hypos that don't move the learning environment forward and/or would help the class with the single exam that determines your grade.
I personally see no issue with it. It is supposed to a very very low level ridicule intended to ring in the gunner’s minor class rom distributing behavior.
Yes, it's a law school term. It has nothing to do with the military. It's someone who is/knows all of the answers/raises hand for everything.
In this context, no, but a gunner is someone who mans a gun station on a vehicle/aircraft in the military.
Anonymous wrote:I believe the proper term is try-hard
Anonymous wrote:Someone could be “gunning” for a promotion - haven’t you all heard it in this context? It goes beyond law school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have seen it used at law school. Generally, where a student sucks up time and tries to impress the teacher with questions or hypos that don't move the learning environment forward and/or would help the class with the single exam that determines your grade.
I personally see no issue with it. It is supposed to a very very low level ridicule intended to ring in the gunner’s minor class rom distributing behavior.
Yes, it's a law school term. It has nothing to do with the military. It's someone who is/knows all of the answers/raises hand for everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never heard this - what does it mean in this context?
it's same as "striver" which some people on here so vociferously objected to it's not used anymore.
Anonymous wrote:I've never heard this - what does it mean in this context?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who is using that and where? I've only ever heard it as a name or as a job function in the military
where? read the titles of posts, at a minimum
Maybe you link to them since nobody else seems to be able to answer the question or find the posts.
Anonymous wrote:It gets used a lot, has no specific meaning, no parent of even the most impressive student is ever going to describe their kid that way, basically it’s just a sour grapes way to slam hard working 20-year-olds which seems kind of gross. I think we can do better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have seen it used at law school. Generally, where a student sucks up time and tries to impress the teacher with questions or hypos that don't move the learning environment forward and/or would help the class with the single exam that determines your grade.
I personally see no issue with it. It is supposed to a very very low level ridicule intended to ring in the gunner’s minor class rom distributing behavior.
Yes, it's a law school term. It has nothing to do with the military. It's someone who is/knows all of the answers/raises hand for everything.