Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many times are going to post stuff like this? Please touch grass and heal.
Yeah, I don’t understand the purpose of these posts. Does OP just want everyone to jump on and agree? How many more posts at this topic are necessary? There’s just no value added.
Because OPs kid goes to a state university that accepts everyone and is trying to feel better about themselves.
LOL. Not only is this not true, I'm not the one being defensive. Which says a lot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is it somehow so crazy to imagine that all people might benefit from having some fun, at regular intervals, throughout their lives? This idea that scoring high on the SAT means you need to be chained to a wheel of misery from the age of 17, or 34, or whatever, just … why? Why not enjoy your life at each stage?
Why is it so crazy to imagine that “fun” is different for different people? For some people, the big college experience is fun. For others, the SLAC experience is fun. To each, their own.
Let’s be honest: the majority of students who find themselves at small liberal art colleges selected them because at 17 they lacked the confidence to see themselves thriving at big schools. And in retrospect many regret it.
Nope. I went to one of the top private schools in the country and big football schools were just not considered. No one remotely considered any of the SEC schools, you would have been laughed at. I hadn’t even heard of Clemson or Auburn until about 10, 15 years ago. It was either Ivy or top SLAC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is it somehow so crazy to imagine that all people might benefit from having some fun, at regular intervals, throughout their lives? This idea that scoring high on the SAT means you need to be chained to a wheel of misery from the age of 17, or 34, or whatever, just … why? Why not enjoy your life at each stage?
Why is it so crazy to imagine that “fun” is different for different people? For some people, the big college experience is fun. For others, the SLAC experience is fun. To each, their own.
Let’s be honest: the majority of students who find themselves at small liberal art colleges selected them because at 17 they lacked the confidence to see themselves thriving at big schools. And in retrospect many regret it.
Nope. I went to one of the top private schools in the country and big football schools were just not considered. No one remotely considered any of the SEC schools, you would have been laughed at. I hadn’t even heard of Clemson or Auburn until about 10, 15 years ago. It was either Ivy or top SLAC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we all agree to this? I mean, so much fun, so much variety, and more often than not plenty of smart kids and top academic opportunities?
Who wouldn't want to be a smart, good looking and outgoing Greek guy or girl at an SEC, Big Ten or ACC school? What a time and place to be young.
lol nice joke. College is not about sports. A top school that also has some sports, sure(Stanford, Duke, Notre Dame), but picking predominantly for sports and greek is a waste of funds.
Exactly. Will add that ND also offers residential life that is more inclusive, more organic, and less expensive than Greek life in SEC schools. And probably more fun. Plus, ND will beat plenty of SEC teams with Freeman at the helm.
Ha ha. If you can afford Notre Dame, you don’t have to worry too much about paying for Greek life at an SEC school. This response is laughable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Zero 0️⃣ interest in that.
Uh huh. Says the kid sitting alone in the cafeteria.
Found the parent of the school bully.
Hardly. I just feel sorry for them. Big difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is this weird emphasis on good looking? It’s really sad that it sounds like some ninth grader writing this but I know it’s some 50+ parent.
Most good looking people are nice, and confident -- and that makes them fun. DCUM hates good looking people for some reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vibe at NESCACs is so subdued, everything seems muted, like a black & white painting. In the winter they’re so depressing.
Oh, I loved winter the most. So quiet and peaceful. I went to big football games at my sibling’s school but loved living and working on a smaller campus.
“Quiet and peaceful” is for old people. Not college students.
Not all college students. You’ve got blinders on.
Who wants to go to college with 18 year olds in search of peace and quiet?? Shoot me now.
Yes, would someone please shoot this tiresome poster? Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Almost everyone in DC is ugly, so I guess your children will never know what this is like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many times are going to post stuff like this? Please touch grass and heal.
Yeah, I don’t understand the purpose of these posts. Does OP just want everyone to jump on and agree? How many more posts at this topic are necessary? There’s just no value added.
Because OPs kid goes to a state university that accepts everyone and is trying to feel better about themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is it somehow so crazy to imagine that all people might benefit from having some fun, at regular intervals, throughout their lives? This idea that scoring high on the SAT means you need to be chained to a wheel of misery from the age of 17, or 34, or whatever, just … why? Why not enjoy your life at each stage?
Why is it so crazy to imagine that “fun” is different for different people? For some people, the big college experience is fun. For others, the SLAC experience is fun. To each, their own.
Let’s be honest: the majority of students who find themselves at small liberal art colleges selected them because at 17 they lacked the confidence to see themselves thriving at big schools. And in retrospect many regret it.
Nope. I went to one of the top private schools in the country and big football schools were just not considered. No one remotely considered any of the SEC schools, you would have been laughed at. I hadn’t even heard of Clemson or Auburn until about 10, 15 years ago. It was either Ivy or top SLAC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it's the best college experience for people whose life ends after college.
I always laugh at this “retort” because we all know that the adults who are most likely to angle to drop the name of their alma mater into any conversation that they conceivably can are Ivy and SLAC graduates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:🤮🤮🤮
What'sabout smart, young, fun and good looking kids having a great time and getting a good education at a big state school that playing big time football?
“The only real college experience”
🙄
Yes, that's what I said. Real. Not nerdy and egg headed.
So college is about football, not academics? Explains why the US has fallen grievously behind.
Except it hasn't. And who said "not academics?" Many big football schools have outstanding academics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is it somehow so crazy to imagine that all people might benefit from having some fun, at regular intervals, throughout their lives? This idea that scoring high on the SAT means you need to be chained to a wheel of misery from the age of 17, or 34, or whatever, just … why? Why not enjoy your life at each stage?
Why is it so crazy to imagine that “fun” is different for different people? For some people, the big college experience is fun. For others, the SLAC experience is fun. To each, their own.
+1. I'm a Chicago grad and I had fun when I was there. It wasn't a wheel of misery in the slightest. Not everyone would find that environment enjoyable but I did.
You’d have more fun in a big football school—or just about any other school really.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The vibe at NESCACs is so subdued, everything seems muted, like a black & white painting. In the winter they’re so depressing.
Oh, I loved winter the most. So quiet and peaceful. I went to big football games at my sibling’s school but loved living and working on a smaller campus.
“Quiet and peaceful” is for old people. Not college students.
Not all college students. You’ve got blinders on.
Who wants to go to college with 18 year olds in search of peace and quiet?? Shoot me now.