Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

How's this for ya

https://twitter.com/Tjonessrq/status/928978372063121408


Teresa Jones?
@Tjonessrq
Follow Follow @Tjonessrq
More
#roymoore As a Deputy DA in Gadsden when Roy Moore was there, it was common knowledge about Roy’s propensity for teenage girls. I’m appalled that these women are being skewered for the truth.#MorningJoe #FoxNews

Ohhh, a Twitter post! Well, that makes it all so real!

I think you just don't believe women.

I am a woman. I believe in fact, not feelings.

When you’re a 32 year old man and you have to ask for a mother’s permission to date her daughter ... sigh. Try as he might, Moore and his mouth breathing supporters can’t be allowed reframe the issue as one of social norms relating to dating as a means of obfuscating sexual abuse of a 14 year old.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?

She volunteers for the opposition's campaign for God's sake.

I would too if I knew the other candidate was a degenerate. And yet she didn’t tell her story to the Jones campaign. It took the WaPo coming to her. Festival of idiots.

Doesn't that seem a bit convenient for you? That she would hide, terrified, given all her activism until she was 'sought after' by the Post? She hardly seems the meek type, does she?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?

She volunteers for the opposition's campaign for God's sake.

I would too if I knew the other candidate was a degenerate. And yet she didn’t tell her story to the Jones campaign. It took the WaPo coming to her. Festival of idiots.

Doesn't that seem a bit convenient for you? That she would hide, terrified, given all her activism until she was 'sought after' by the Post? She hardly seems the meek type, does she?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?

She volunteers for the opposition's campaign for God's sake.

I would too if I knew the other candidate was a degenerate. And yet she didn’t tell her story to the Jones campaign. It took the WaPo coming to her. Festival of idiots.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?

She volunteers for the opposition's campaign for God's sake.

Maybe because she was grossed out by the memory of the Republican candidate hitting on her when she was a teenager and he was an adult with a lot of power.

That would make me volunteer for the opposition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

How's this for ya

https://twitter.com/Tjonessrq/status/928978372063121408


Teresa Jones?
@Tjonessrq
Follow Follow @Tjonessrq
More
#roymoore As a Deputy DA in Gadsden when Roy Moore was there, it was common knowledge about Roy’s propensity for teenage girls. I’m appalled that these women are being skewered for the truth.#MorningJoe #FoxNews

Ohhh, a Twitter post! Well, that makes it all so real!

I think you just don't believe women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?

She volunteers for the opposition's campaign for God's sake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?

She volunteers for the opposition's campaign for God's sake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

How's this for ya

https://twitter.com/Tjonessrq/status/928978372063121408


Teresa Jones?
@Tjonessrq
Follow Follow @Tjonessrq
More
#roymoore As a Deputy DA in Gadsden when Roy Moore was there, it was common knowledge about Roy’s propensity for teenage girls. I’m appalled that these women are being skewered for the truth.#MorningJoe #FoxNews

Ohhh, a Twitter post! Well, that makes it all so real!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

Did the world see the evidence on Wiener?

Wiener just started a prison sentence. If Moore turns himself in, that would be great.

Only HALF of Alabamans now support Moore as polling has him tied with Jones. Can we build a wall around Alabama and make them pay for it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

There is no spin, other than the spin coming from Daily Caller and others who somehow forgot to mention in their breathless articles that she was hired because she is one of the very few number of licensed sign language interpreters in Alabama.

https://www.redstate.com/sarah-rumpf/2017/11/11/tone-deaf-attempt-discrediting-one-roy-moores-accusers/

OOPS. There goes another right wing conspiracy theory, busted to bits.

And she volunteers for his opponent. AND her FB page is all about her anarchy and hate for Trump and conservatives. Is that due to sign language expertise as well?

Your argument is that we can never believe that someone of one political party was harassed / molested / assaulted by someone of a different political party, because such accusations are always politically motivated?