Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jerry Falwell Jr asked for prayers today. Not for the victims, but for Roy Moore. #fakechristianvalues

Pedophiles need love too. Maybe Jerry Falwell should send his parishioners' kids over there to comfort poor ole Roy.

Only the pubescent daughters!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jerry Falwell Jr asked for prayers today. Not for the victims, but for Roy Moore. #fakechristianvalues

Pedophiles need love too. Maybe Jerry Falwell should send his parishioners' kids over there to comfort poor ole Roy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

The WaPo has 30 sources to corroborate. THIRTY.

WaPo is "hateful" for a reason. It's because guys like Roy More *actually are* scumbags. Instead of sitting there constantly glaring at the WaPo, maybe you should swivel that chair around the other way and see what's going on right behind your own back because you seem completely oblivious to the WHY of what's going on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

Then why not one single report of this until now?

Anonymous wrote:Jerry Falwell Jr asked for prayers today. Not for the victims, but for Roy Moore. #fakechristianvalues

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

The world saw the evidence on Wiener, Bozo.
I'd like something on Moore, beyond the hateful WaPo.

Anonymous wrote:Jerry Falwell Jr asked for prayers today. Not for the victims, but for Roy Moore. #fakechristianvalues

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't it interesting how the exact same people who spent countless hours trying to conjure up an imaginary pizza-based secret pedophilia code despite zero witnesses, zero accusers, zero other evidence are now so quick to dismiss and deny a story about a pedophile which has multiple accusers and at least 30 actual sources?

We are questioning the story, given what's now coming out about the accusers. And so are many others.

I don't recall ever giving the pizza-gate story anything but a yawn and an eye-roll. The Hollywood pedophile thing? Seems liberals are not pure.

What's "coming out about the accusers" is nothing but desperate right wing spin. And you were all over the Pizzagate thing. We had plenty of threads featuring resident right wing DCUMers drooling over that one. Weinstein on the other hand? Liberals, to the last, swiftly denounced him. But here you are, still whining about Moore, despite the fact that there are dozens of sources and despite the fact that the accusations and statements go back decades, to well before Roy Moore ever even got into politics. It's precisely that which makes the accusations all the more credible.

How do you spin her Facebook page and photos with Clinton and Biden?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really don't see the relevance of the women's political leaning either way. Their stories are corroborated independently by 32+ witnesses and contemporaneous court records. Moore would not even deny dating underaged girls. There is no factual basis to doubt their claims.

You should. If the people of Alabama see this as being planted, what does that mean for the press and for the Democrats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really don't see the relevance of the women's political leaning either way. Their stories are corroborated independently by 32+ witnesses and contemporaneous court records. Moore would not even deny dating underaged girls. There is no factual basis to doubt their claims.

You should. If the people of Alabama see this as being planted, what does that mean for the press and for the Democrats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Wiener's sexting a teenager?

Wonder if there were 77 plus pages on Menendez' sex with DR teens?

Not one person I can think of defended Wiener. Not one.
I don't remember too much about the Menendez case. He was indicted for corruption and good riddance.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/454066.page

If everyone agreed that a man who preys on young girls should not become a US senator we would not have this long thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is only one accusation that he is a pedophile. You don't find that odd? Usually, there is a pattern.

And, no, it would not be at all unusual for a guy in a small town to go to high school football games. It would be perfectly normal--that's where most of the town would be on a Friday night.

I’m guessing 7th and 8th graders might be a little intimidated to accuse the District Attorney of sexual abuse.

For 40 years?

And they found their courage only when Moore was to be the Republican nominee for senator and at that point they decided to share that information with the Washington Post who just happened to endorse the Democrat for the same senate seat.