Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the following thread link here got me thinking about how AI will cause painful job loses. And how trump isn’t going to be around forever; a little over 2 years and he’s out for good.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1292491.page
We probably can’t stop greedy big-business from replacing the people with AI, but we sure can control government (once we are back in control).
So, why not just ban AI from the government entirely?
We can go a step further and try to restrict , as much as we can, the use of computer-technology in government?
Why not require paper backups (typed paper) for every offial document of any type? You could still have the e-file type systems, but just require that someone type it up on paper, like we used to?
It could save hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.
What kind of weirdo troll is this? People in government want to do a good job using the best tools available, just like people not in government. No one wants to be a typist for a living.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the following thread link here got me thinking about how AI will cause painful job loses. And how trump isn’t going to be around forever; a little over 2 years and he’s out for good.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1292491.page
We probably can’t stop greedy big-business from replacing the people with AI, but we sure can control government (once we are back in control).
So, why not just ban AI from the government entirely?
We can go a step further and try to restrict , as much as we can, the use of computer-technology in government?
Why not require paper backups (typed paper) for every offial document of any type? You could still have the e-file type systems, but just require that someone type it up on paper, like we used to?
It could save hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.
What kind of weirdo troll is this? People in government want to do a good job using the best tools available, just like people not in government. No one wants to be a typist for a living.
Anonymous wrote:So the following thread link here got me thinking about how AI will cause painful job loses. And how trump isn’t going to be around forever; a little over 2 years and he’s out for good.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1292491.page
We probably can’t stop greedy big-business from replacing the people with AI, but we sure can control government (once we are back in control).
So, why not just ban AI from the government entirely?
We can go a step further and try to restrict , as much as we can, the use of computer-technology in government?
Why not require paper backups (typed paper) for every offial document of any type? You could still have the e-file type systems, but just require that someone type it up on paper, like we used to?
It could save hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.
Anonymous wrote:AI sucks for lawyer work. It's actually worse than useless because it gives a partially correct answer but unless you already know the answer you will miss the fact that the AI answer either misses an exception or an important factual distinction.
Anonymous wrote:You must a boomer. I am a millennial fed and I am so excited to have AI in our agency. It will help loosen workload and let people focus on their actual skills to promote mission.
Anonymous wrote:So the following thread link here got me thinking about how AI will cause painful job loses. And how trump isn’t going to be around forever; a little over 2 years and he’s out for good.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1292491.page
We probably can’t stop greedy big-business from replacing the people with AI, but we sure can control government (once we are back in control).
So, why not just ban AI from the government entirely?
We can go a step further and try to restrict , as much as we can, the use of computer-technology in government?
Why not require paper backups (typed paper) for every offial document of any type? You could still have the e-file type systems, but just require that someone type it up on paper, like we used to?
It could save hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.