Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well if it doesn't really matter one way or another, then why not just do P/F . seems like it just takes the burden off. I would do P/F just for that reason alone (that it doesn't matter anyway) and also this may be why the teacher suggested it.
Because an all A student doesn’t usually know how to coast and do bare passing minimum and so if will do all the work that would get them an A anyway should just take for grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well if it doesn't really matter one way or another, then why not just do P/F . seems like it just takes the burden off. I would do P/F just for that reason alone (that it doesn't matter anyway) and also this may be why the teacher suggested it.
Because an all A student doesn’t usually know how to coast and do bare passing minimum and so if will do all the work that would get them an A anyway should just take for grade.
Anonymous wrote:Well if it doesn't really matter one way or another, then why not just do P/F . seems like it just takes the burden off. I would do P/F just for that reason alone (that it doesn't matter anyway) and also this may be why the teacher suggested it.
Anonymous wrote:When I was applying to Yale in 1967, the admissions officer told me it was my A+ in PE that really put me over the top. He said he throws P/F apps in the trash.
Anonymous wrote:No more valedictorians so no reason to care about it “bringing down” a gpa and the schools likely looking at if taking AP courses do unweighted GPA anyway so no benefit to GPA to take P/F and just if want to not do less work in the health parts of the class can do P/F but it won’t be any help to take P/F for colleges