Reply to VRSC

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "VRSC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I agree with PP.  Girls should be putting in work to get better.  They are practicing 4-5 days a week already so I'm not sure what is expected of these young kids.  There should be more available player slots for top leagues including the ECNL league.  The ECNL is taking the opposite direction by merging local clubs in an effort to exclude entire communities from their league.  The GA is expanding their league to provide more opportunities for girls to develop.  Also, many teenagers are just not coachable and will never learn the athletic/game iq combo that's required to play at a higher level.  This is factual and anyone who ever taught or coached teenaged kids knows that some kids will never "get it.". So both PP are correct.[/quote]

This would dilute the player even more. The less GA/ECNL teams the better. This would allow for the concentration of the top talent on a fewer teams. These spots should be for the most talented individuals in a given area.[/quote]

This weekend just showed talent dilution in action.

i completely agree, ECNL consolidating teams is a good thing from a competition standpoint. I think if you're training everyday against the best players in the area it's only going to make you better vs if you're the best player on the team and have no one to challenge you, then you'll plateau.  Also as a competitor my daughter wants to win, she doesn't want to spend a week traveling to get blown out, that sucks.  We need less national platform teams in the area not more.

A lot of parents don't agree because it's less opportunities for their child to be seen by college coaches to play in college.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics