Reply to new Reade/Biden thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This adds a new wrinkle.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/AriFleischer/status/1258552767284723713[/twitter][/quote]

How so? This looks like it corroborates her accusation of sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Or did you not read the article?[/quote]

+1 He only knows what she told him at the time and she said nothing about sexual assault. And he wants nothing to do with backing up her story now.[/quote]

Wouldn't she have told her husband if she was raped? Why would he call her rape "sexual harassment"?[/quote]

I thought women were allowed to react in any way they choose, telling (or not telling) anyone they choose?  Isn’t that what we’ve been told?  Who are YOU to question what a rape victim does or doesn’t do?

Sound familiar?[/quote]

They certainly are.

What's your point? Are you going to write in q candidate?[/quote]

The point, since you missed it, is why are you questioning what she may or may not have done, after a sexual assault?  We all know how outraged you are when anyone questions the motive of someone accusing a conservative man.  Verboten!!   :roll: [/quote]

You actually had a good point above but when you posted this you blew it. Thanks for revealing that you don't actually believe anything you post and just think rape is a tool for political manipulation.[/quote]

Nice try, but utter fail.  Do I think some women falsely accuse men of rape for political manipulation?  Yes, I do.  And so do you.  But interestingly, before Tara Reade, no one was allowed to say this.  Now, however, you Democrats are showing everyone that it is perfectly ok to believe a woman is lying if she accuses a Democrat of rape.  That’s the qualifier, of course.  [/quote]

Not pp, but you’ve tried this line of reasoning for the last 60 pages and it’s failed every time. There should be a presumption that we believe her, and then we investigate and decide. Nobody ever, ever said that credulity is mandatory when the accuser is a grifter, her story keeps changing, her few friends keep changing their stories, and nobody in the Senate can remember her.

If you hadn’t noticed how the Pussy Grabber’s many, many accusers are still being shredded by the Con press, you’ve been living under a rock. Dems aren’t still claiming people like Swetnik are telling the truth, and they won’t if any of the Pussy Grabber’s victims are proven false, either.

Obviously the truth and reason don’t work for you, because you’re grasping at straws to defend your horrific Pussy Grabber candidate. So you keep repeating the false narratives. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics