Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone asked Biden whether he remembers this woman?

Do you live in a vacuum, just come out of a coma, or
are you just stupid?

All of the above. Don’t feed the troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This adds a new wrinkle.

How so? This looks like it corroborates her accusation of sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Or did you not read the article?

+1 He only knows what she told him at the time and she said nothing about sexual assault. And he wants nothing to do with backing up her story now.

Wouldn't she have told her husband if she was raped? Why would he call her rape "sexual harassment"?

I thought women were allowed to react in any way they choose, telling (or not telling) anyone they choose? Isn’t that what we’ve been told? Who are YOU to question what a rape victim does or doesn’t do?

Sound familiar?

Yes. This sounds like the exact opposite of what Republicans were saying during the allegations in 2018 and with all the rape and assault allegations against Trump. Lots of hypocrites on both sides here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a drama lama and completely unbelievable. Lies everywhere she goes.

If your boss, husband and father have all "assaulted" you,
Are lying trailer trash and belong on "Tiger King."

Most victims of childhood abuse get abused by others as well throughout their lives. Your post is pretty offensive to the survivors.

Stop already. Reade lied.

Anonymous wrote:She is a drama lama and completely unbelievable. Lies everywhere she goes.

If your boss, husband and father have all "assaulted" you,
Are lying trailer trash and belong on "Tiger King."

Most victims of childhood abuse get abused by others as well throughout their lives. Your post is pretty offensive to the survivors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone asked Biden whether he remembers this woman?

Do you live in a vacuum, just come out of a coma, or
are you just stupid?

Ignore. It’s another desperate Con attempt to dis the candidate who’s beating their moronic bleach shots guy.

We need a name for this desperate Con attempt at a gotcha game. It’s getting boring to out all these Cons trying to argue that, unless we believe a liar like Reade, we can’t investigate Trump’s two dozen victims.

Con Reade Screed
Pussy Grabber False Equivalence
Con Women Haters’ Gotcha Game

Needs to be catchier though.

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone asked Biden whether he remembers this woman?

Do you live in a vacuum, just come out of a coma, or
are you just stupid?

She is a drama lama and completely unbelievable. Lies everywhere she goes.

If your boss, husband and father have all "assaulted" you,
Are lying trailer trash and belong on "Tiger King."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This adds a new wrinkle.

How so? This looks like it corroborates her accusation of sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Or did you not read the article?

+1 He only knows what she told him at the time and she said nothing about sexual assault. And he wants nothing to do with backing up her story now.

Wouldn't she have told her husband if she was raped? Why would he call her rape "sexual harassment"?

I thought women were allowed to react in any way they choose, telling (or not telling) anyone they choose? Isn’t that what we’ve been told? Who are YOU to question what a rape victim does or doesn’t do?

Sound familiar?

They certainly are.

What's your point? Are you going to write in q candidate?

The point, since you missed it, is why are you questioning what she may or may not have done, after a sexual assault? We all know how outraged you are when anyone questions the motive of someone accusing a conservative man. Verboten!!

DP. Glad to hear you'll take a similar stance about Trump's two dozen accusers.

Actually, I’d really love to hear what Trump’s accusers have to say. You know, dates, times, places, corroboration, etc. Of course, we’d need to look into their personal lives too, you know - to see if they’re people of “character.” Just as the media has done with Tara Reade. I’d truly love to know ALLLLLLL about these accusers. Thanks to you, we all know it’s no longer forbidden to say out loud that we doubt someone, or that someone sounds like a crackpot. It should be quite easy to determine who is lying and who is not. Bring it on!

ITA! bring it on! If you’re hoping that all 24 accusers of a guy who has admitted to grabbing pussy are going to be proved liars, you’re delusional or smoking something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This adds a new wrinkle.

How so? This looks like it corroborates her accusation of sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Or did you not read the article?

+1 He only knows what she told him at the time and she said nothing about sexual assault. And he wants nothing to do with backing up her story now.

Wouldn't she have told her husband if she was raped? Why would he call her rape "sexual harassment"?

I thought women were allowed to react in any way they choose, telling (or not telling) anyone they choose? Isn’t that what we’ve been told? Who are YOU to question what a rape victim does or doesn’t do?

Sound familiar?

They certainly are.

What's your point? Are you going to write in q candidate?

The point, since you missed it, is why are you questioning what she may or may not have done, after a sexual assault? We all know how outraged you are when anyone questions the motive of someone accusing a conservative man. Verboten!!

You actually had a good point above but when you posted this you blew it. Thanks for revealing that you don't actually believe anything you post and just think rape is a tool for political manipulation.

Nice try, but utter fail. Do I think some women falsely accuse men of rape for political manipulation? Yes, I do. And so do you. But interestingly, before Tara Reade, no one was allowed to say this. Now, however, you Democrats are showing everyone that it is perfectly ok to believe a woman is lying if she accuses a Democrat of rape. That’s the qualifier, of course.

Not pp, but you’ve tried this line of reasoning for the last 60 pages and it’s failed every time. There should be a presumption that we believe her, and then we investigate and decide. Nobody ever, ever said that credulity is mandatory when the accuser is a grifter, her story keeps changing, her few friends keep changing their stories, and nobody in the Senate can remember her.

If you hadn’t noticed how the Pussy Grabber’s many, many accusers are still being shredded by the Con press, you’ve been living under a rock. Dems aren’t still claiming people like Swetnik are telling the truth, and they won’t if any of the Pussy Grabber’s victims are proven false, either.

Obviously the truth and reason don’t work for you, because you’re grasping at straws to defend your horrific Pussy Grabber candidate. So you keep repeating the false narratives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a professional victim. The former of Chief of Staff says she never came to him with a complaint. She told her former husband that "someone" in the office was harassing her and gave no names. If a US Senator was sexually assaulting her then she would have used his name. I think she suffers from erotomania!

Biden was vetted to the inth degree by Obama's campaign and any court proceeding from 1996 would have shown up. Women who make up these lies about any man, Republican or Democrat, should go to prison!

I guess Biden would need to be the one to sue her or file charges. Yet he's been surprisingly reticent given that he must know what we all know, about her changing stories and her past.

We need an investigation. Was anybody coaching or paying her? Like those two dudes from the Miller, Warren and Fauci allegations.

Her new lawyer has donated a LOT of money to the Trump campaign and the RNC. He’s also very expensive. Makes you wonder who’s paying him.

...and here’s her other lawyer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This adds a new wrinkle.

How so? This looks like it corroborates her accusation of sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Or did you not read the article?

+1 He only knows what she told him at the time and she said nothing about sexual assault. And he wants nothing to do with backing up her story now.

Wouldn't she have told her husband if she was raped? Why would he call her rape "sexual harassment"?

I thought women were allowed to react in any way they choose, telling (or not telling) anyone they choose? Isn’t that what we’ve been told? Who are YOU to question what a rape victim does or doesn’t do?

Sound familiar?

They certainly are.

What's your point? Are you going to write in q candidate?

The point, since you missed it, is why are you questioning what she may or may not have done, after a sexual assault? We all know how outraged you are when anyone questions the motive of someone accusing a conservative man. Verboten!!

You actually had a good point above but when you posted this you blew it. Thanks for revealing that you don't actually believe anything you post and just think rape is a tool for political manipulation.

Nice try, but utter fail. Do I think some women falsely accuse men of rape for political manipulation? Yes, I do. And so do you. But interestingly, before Tara Reade, no one was allowed to say this. Now, however, you Democrats are showing everyone that it is perfectly ok to believe a woman is lying if she accuses a Democrat of rape. That’s the qualifier, of course.

Has anyone asked Biden whether he remembers this woman?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This adds a new wrinkle.

How so? This looks like it corroborates her accusation of sexual harassment, not sexual assault. Or did you not read the article?

+1 He only knows what she told him at the time and she said nothing about sexual assault. And he wants nothing to do with backing up her story now.

Wouldn't she have told her husband if she was raped? Why would he call her rape "sexual harassment"?

I thought women were allowed to react in any way they choose, telling (or not telling) anyone they choose? Isn’t that what we’ve been told? Who are YOU to question what a rape victim does or doesn’t do?

Sound familiar?

They certainly are.

What's your point? Are you going to write in q candidate?

The point, since you missed it, is why are you questioning what she may or may not have done, after a sexual assault? We all know how outraged you are when anyone questions the motive of someone accusing a conservative man. Verboten!!

DP. Glad to hear you'll take a similar stance about Trump's two dozen accusers.

Actually, I’d really love to hear what Trump’s accusers have to say. You know, dates, times, places, corroboration, etc. Of course, we’d need to look into their personal lives too, you know - to see if they’re people of “character.” Just as the media has done with Tara Reade. I’d truly love to know ALLLLLLL about these accusers. Thanks to you, we all know it’s no longer forbidden to say out loud that we doubt someone, or that someone sounds like a crackpot. It should be quite easy to determine who is lying and who is not. Bring it on!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a professional victim. The former of Chief of Staff says she never came to him with a complaint. She told her former husband that "someone" in the office was harassing her and gave no names. If a US Senator was sexually assaulting her then she would have used his name. I think she suffers from erotomania!

Biden was vetted to the inth degree by Obama's campaign and any court proceeding from 1996 would have shown up. Women who make up these lies about any man, Republican or Democrat, should go to prison!

I guess Biden would need to be the one to sue her or file charges. Yet he's been surprisingly reticent given that he must know what we all know, about her changing stories and her past.

We need an investigation. Was anybody coaching or paying her? Like those two dudes from the Miller, Warren and Fauci allegations.

Her new lawyer has donated a LOT of money to the Trump campaign and the RNC. He’s also very expensive. Makes you wonder who’s paying him.

...and here’s her other lawyer.

https://apnews.com/10d2842623b2c299e2c673bf5a9e23ff