Reply to About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't think it's fair to judge Hillary on her actions in the 90s by the standards we have now.

We're usually much more careful about using a woman's past, especially her sexual past, to discredit her now than we were 20 years ago.*

That being said, if you believe that your political enemies are manufacturing adultery stories in order to ruin your husband's political career, wouldn't it make sense to try to discredit them?  I'm not sure what I would have done in her situation.

Bill told Hillary that he hadn't been unfaithful and these women were lying, and she believed him.  From the story, it looks like she was on board with trying to show that the women were not telling the truth, but she did not direct the efforts.  Later, when she found out Bill had lied to her about affairs, she felt betrayed and had to take stock of her marriage.

* Donald Trump DURING THIS ELECTION has personally used a woman's sexual history in an attempt to discredit her.  To my mind this is worse than what Hillary did.

I don't think it's wrong for this issue to be discussed.  It's a good issue for feminists to think about, especially feminists who want to be politicians.  This was sort of new ground when Clinton was involved in it in the nineties and I think she was in a bit of a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation.

Know what's worse?  Donald Trump's lewd and sexist behavior on The Apprentice set.  I also think it's nuts that adulterer Donald Trump and his team of sexist adulterous advisors including Guliani and Ailes want to lecture a woman on how to behave when your husband is accused of cheating.  [/quote]

+ 1,000,000[/quote]

Mental gymnastics.  Liberals are clamoring on about Trump making s comment years ago about a Miss Universe winner.  Hillary paraded her around, it was on CNN.  So there isn't a time limit in this stuff.

Trump may have said some unflattering things, Bill has raped and assaulted multiple women, and Hillary enables it.  Not only enables,  it makes the victims worse off silencing them and intimidating them.  She's deplorable and so are you for sticking up for her [/quote]

Oh so you're saying that it was okay for Trump to call Machado Miss Piggy and Miss Housekeeping in 1996, even though things are different now?

BTW, you lose this argument because Trump doubled down and insulted Machado all over again for this entire last week.  In fact he made things even worse by trying to discredit her by casting aspersions on her sexual history.  LAST WEEK.  A FEW DAYS AGO.  Which is exactly what he is accusing Hillary of doing in the nineties, except he is doing it right now.  Stay classy, Donald.

PS:  [url]http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/10/03/report_donald_trump_sexually_harassed_apprentice_crew_members_contestants.html[/url][/quote]

Are there any witnesses BESIDE trifling, murder accomplice in venezuela, baby mama to a druglord,and cheating on her fiance with 2 men on a reality show machado and not so truthful clinton to say he DID call her miss piggy or miss housekeeping? Actually all you have to do is look at her NON simulated sex vid on youtube and everyone is calling her "puerca" meaning "PIG" in spanish because they hate her representation. Sad day clinton chooses someone similar to kim k to campaign for her.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics