Reply to What was the “Deport Racism” group thinking?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What was the “Deport Racism” group thinking?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you are equating a clearly racist term like anchor baby with vanilla terms like courage and valor then you are clueless...or perhaps just really racist.[/quote]

You kind of missed the point.  Figures.[/quote]

Nope. You think you are making a valid point, but you are not.

Sticking with your rationalization, there's nothing wrong with wetback, spic, chink, nigger, etc.

You can't carve out a special exception for anchor baby since anchor and baby when used separately are acceptable words. It doesn't work that way. It's a racist, derogatory term. Period. [/quote]

I would never say the above terms, much less type them. Anchor baby is not in the above category. [b]There is not debate about the acceptability of your words above.[/b] There is not debate that FU is a gross swear word.  There is debate about anchor baby. It is a politicized term, and last I heard-it was actually acceptable in the United States for people to disagree over politics.  The point is if we focus on parsing every word with nuance to the 9th degree  we may end up not being able to 'talk' at all. Except in FUs, which I guess you don't find offensive.  You seem very comfortable with the picking and choosing if you are the one doing it?

[/quote]

There was a debate two generations ago.  You think you are different from the backwards people who said "wetback"?  You aren't.  You just grew up in a different generation.  You have accepted that wetback is wrong, but you cannot see how you are repeating the same bigotry.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics