Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Pamela Geller is nuts"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele] While her actions are indisputably legal, they are insulting in a way that is not deserving of praise and support. . [/quote] Suppose supporters of a political leader, say Ted Cruz, decided that no cartoonist should ever draw him. And suppose several cartoonists who did draw Ted Cruz were then murdered. In support of these cartoonists, and to fight their intimidation, a group holds a "Ted Cruz drawing contest" What would you say about the group holding the Ted Cruz drawing contest? A) That while their actions are indisputably legal, they are utterly contemptible, and a provocation and an insult to Ted Cruz supporters everywhere, or B) That they are brave individuals deserving of praise and support, and leaders in the fight to preserve the First Amendment.[/quote] I am surprised that otherwise intelligent (seemingly at least) people seem determined to praise the contemptible Pam Geller. There are several flaws in the analogy that you are making. The most important is that it reduces Geller to a promoter of free speech rather than a leader of a hate movement. Doing that ignores reality. Rather than inventing fanciful analogies, let consider some real life scenarios: 1) Do you consider the Westboro Baptist folks to be "brave individuals deserving of praise and support"? 2) Frequently, Nazis march in DC and elsewhere. Do you consider them to be "brave individuals deserving of praise and support"? 3) The Stormfront website is a forum much like DCUM except that it focus is on white nationalism. Do you consider those posters to be "brave individuals deserving of praise and support"? Even the New York Times' Editorial Board writes, "Ms. Geller revels in assailing Islam in terms reminiscent of virulent racism or anti-Semitism." Do you consider people whose exercise their 1st Amendment rights by spouting virulent racism or anti-Semitism to be "brave individuals deserving of praise and support"? If not, then why would you suggest such a thing about Geller? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics