Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "NYT Investigation of BENGHAZI"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304302704579332732276330284 More to the story about why they didn't keep the military teams in Libya. Goes back to State.[/quote] This has to be the most bewildering thing I have yet read. The guy basically said Chris Stevens didn't speak his mind, and then made a bunch of excuses as to why he couldn't. Protocol required him to decline Ham's requests? WTF? What he isn't saying that is the elephant in the room: We have trouble getting status of forces agreements because of the abuses our military committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's why this thing got screwed up. They figured the CIA people could cover until it was all worked out, and that plan failed.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
