Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Pam Bondi's "testimony" is reading off-topic insults as prompted by her handlers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.[/quote] I'm not that PP, and I lean left and oppose anything MAGA... but grandstanding is a time-honored Congressional practice :-) Both sides do it when convenient to their agenda. Yesterday AG Bondi was horribly disrespectful to the victims of Epstein's sex trafficking endeavor, and everyone could see that she was visibly stressed by the attacks lobed in her direction and could not manage to attack back with the cool demeanor that gaslighting requires. She needed aides to rescue her and she could not hide the fact she needed their support. She appeared weak. Gaslighting cannot work if you show you're desperately trying to gaslight. So if you want to grade everyone on performance, Bondi just failed abysmally. But don't say that representatives on the committee didn't grandstand. They did. They always do. That's not a failure. Apparently it's part of their job description. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics