Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Say what you want.  Doesn’t bother me as the OP.  Feel free to point out the “false truths” in my post.  You conveniently don’t state what those are.  I have a view from the inside looking out.  We can then do a scorecard of where I am wrong after all the chips fall on the table in the next 2 weeks[/quote]

1. NVU and Valor would never be offered an ECNL spot
2. NVA was offered full slate for MLS Next but will not be joining, Revolution was considered for MLS Next youngers

Are you claiming this for just boys side? Boys and girls?

Union and Brave are not necessarily underperforming on girls side, both are terrible on boys side. Both due to lack of talent and coaching. Kevin James being allowed to coach teams is actually comical.[/quote]

1. My comment there was forward looking and speculative.  I did not say that was a fact.

2. If true I will concede but I understood younger for both.  Minor technicality. Only important if NVU took it as it would put in play another ECNL badge in NOVA most likely.

3. Both in terms of merger.  But by strength Union girls dominates and both boys sides struggle. Was unsure what point you were asking on.

4. Agree on KJ but sadly he already has a position of power in current Brave ECNL.  [/quote]
The fact that this post mentions “NVU” - a completely irrelevant club - tells you where this post is coming from.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics