Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Recruited athletes don’t have lower stats!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://www.nber.org/papers/w31753 Seems the skills acquired by student athletes working in teams, working hard towards a goal, and managing extreme time commitments actually pay off after college. I have heard an Ivy admissions say the outcomes of student athletes are better than non-athletes despite their academic admissions boost - but had not seen the literature (no secret Wall St etc has preference for athletes and those are results oriented environments).[/quote] athletes at Ivy League schools already are rich and largely white. If they didn’t achieve success that would be concerning. Wall Street doesn’t have a preference for athletes, it’s a nepotistic hiring process so teammates favor their former teammates. Let’s not pretend it’s some example of merit based hiring. [/quote] Haha there is a definite preference for athletes. They do better at performing multiple tasks while getting screamed at then your average high stat problem set jockey and are relatively better prepared for the eat what you kill grind. It’s not a country club. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics