Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Hilary Swank pregnant with twins "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I know two “older” mothers that both had identical twins the old-fashioned way without fertility help. It absolutely happens. [/quote] The rate of identical twins with ART is much higher than natural conception. You never know with people if they aren't open about treatment.[/quote] This was my sister’s MIL and my SIL’s grandmother so we definitely know they didn’t have fertility treatments since none existed at the time. [/quote] Ok, but its still statistically very rare, your two anecdotes doesn't change anything.[/quote] So why can’t Hilary Swank be one of these cases?[/quote] +1[/quote] Honestly? She’s too thin. Surprise pregnancies at that age don’t happen to super skinny women. They just don’t. [/quote] It’s like you’re posting from the 16th century. She can’t get pregnant — she doesn’t have the birthing hips for it! I was one of those surprise mid 40s babies and my mom weighed 90 pounds soaking wet. Unless you are thin due to malnutrition, weight has nothing to do with fertility. There is however a genetic component to fertility at advanced age. It runs in my family so I had my tubes tied at 40.[/quote] Mid 40s and 48 are really different though. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics