Reply to Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It was definitely a lot more salacious than it needed to be. Honestly, she didn’t need to share the gritty details about searching his house and the prescriptions to be broadcast to tens of thousands of people. Those poor kids constantly having to relive things and suffering because neither of their parents can/could keep their mouths shut on public mediums. It didn’t even seem pertinent in relation to “survival”. What did she survive? The only reason she’s where she’s at now is because he died. Where’s the lesson in that? And she completely glossed over her addiction and the cause of her second divorce in favor of trashing her kids’ father under the guise of divorce/relationship advice. So unnecessary and disappointing. And Sarah really sucks as an interviewer.[/quote]

I see your point, but I can't fault her for this after his public takedown of her on-air and lies about their custody agreement. I was never a 'fan' of either one of these people, but it seems unfair to expect her to take the high road while her late husband disparaged her to thousands of listeners. [/quote]

Totally I agree with us! Being a child of an alcoholic I had to endure many lies told about me to hide their drinking. There is something refreshing about finally getting to be able to tell you’re part of the story.

It really drove me crazy as it seemed Sarah tried to compare her trauma to Natasha‘s. There is no comparing, but also she was an employee, Natasha was a wife, mother, someone who was in a relationship with him since she  was 19 years old. It just felt wrong. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics