Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "How Do We Fix The Mental Health Crisis Among Affluent Teens? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was reading this article in The Atlantic about the suicides at Palo Alto High School: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/12/the-silicon-valley-suicides/413140/ It seems like living in a pressure cooker full of wealthy, well-educated parents in a highly academic environment is a major factor in poor mental health among teenagers. I remember reading a sociological study showing that depression, anxiety, and drug abuse among teenagers plotted to their SES status was like a horseshoe -- most common among wealthy/UMC and poor teens (for very different reasons), but least common among the middle-middle class. Anecdotally, from DD's private, it seems like almost half of the kids we know are on medications and see a therapist or psychiatrist on a regular basis. The stress and pressure just seem nuts to me, and the constant judgement and competition seem unhealthy for teenagers. Are there any ways that we as parents can fix this? Pull our kids out of private and put them in an economically diverse public? Move to the Midwest? Insist that our kids don't have to take the most rigorous classes available to them? Be okay with them going to UMD or a SLAC ranked below the Top 20 rather than an Ivy? Put them in therapy with an intense cycle of medications?[/quote] I recommend The Price of Privilege: How Parental Pressure and Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of Disconnected and Unhappy Kids by Madeline Levine. I am UMC (HHI of $800k in Richmond) and your suggestions about economically diverse publics and not stressing about the most rigorous path are my philosophy. I attended an uber-competitive high school and was getting four hours of sleep a night in 10th grade. Then I went to a fairly highly ranked (back-up for Ivies) college and it was easy because my high school was so hard. I don't know that this gained me much advantage in life . . . I already had so many advantages. It did mean that I had rarely interacted with people who weren't at least solidly middle class. So we're not doing that with our kids. They attend Title 1 city schools. None of our middle schools are fully accredited but guess what . . . they're just schools where lots of great things are happening. Our kids are curious and driven and caring and when we had to decide if we were going to make our 6th grader take Spanish (the only language offered) or the elected they really wanted, we went with the elective even knowing it could hurt high school application chances. We're fine with our zoned school if none of the application schools work out. My kids are going to enter adulthood with resources and connections and life experiences thanks to their family situation, regardless of where they go to school and how rigorous it is. They will also be more able to relate to people who come from different backgrounds, and not in the empathy-tourism way that private schools do when they adopt an inner city school or whatever. If you are at all interested in throwing off this constant parental anxiety that one false move on our part may screw our kids up forever, I think that's a worthwhile journey to take. With our income, our kids are ahead of almost every other human on the planet already. I don't know how to teach my kids what's important while throwing them into a maelstrom of what's not important (materialism, perfectionism, competitiveness for competitiveness' sake, etc.). Of course I want my kids to have fulfilling careers that pay the bills, but I also want to teach them -- and model -- that once your basic needs are met, more money doesn't make you happier. It's literally just, more money, more problems unless you can keep the perspective that everything beyond X is gravy rather than recalibrating your "needs" to meet your income every time your income increases. And it's much easier to do that when your neighbors, classmates, and friends represent a wide variety of backgrounds rather than all UMC strivers. Talk is cheap. Show your kids what you value by how you live your life and structure theirs. If you surround yourself with a bunch of helicopter parents who just want to hang out at the country club all the time, then you will absorb their values and anxieties whether you want to or not. And this is a serious question . . . if the childhood you provide for your kids is all "pay to play" ($$$ to join the country club, $$$ to send them to school), then your kid has to strive for that income or else they'll feel like they're letting down their own kids, right? They won't have any concept of what it's like to go to public school or the neighborhood pool or whatever, and they'll feel like those things are "less than." So there goes any career that might be highly fulfilling like social work or teaching, but which doesn't pay enough to sustain that lifestyle. (Maybe this is why so many grandparents pay private school tuition, lol. . . .recognition that they gave their kids champagne tastes but only set them up to have a beer budget.)[/quote] I would say you don’t have teens yet. Come back in 7 years and you’ll be able to comment then. Maybe this works. I wonder what you’ll do if one of your kids wants to go to a pressure cooker boarding school. Tell them no?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics