Reply to Rosemary Hills/Bethesda/CC/NCC Boundry study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Rosemary Hills/Bethesda/CC/NCC Boundry study - Superintendent's Recommendation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]It's clear from the most recent posts here, that the boundary and matriculation pattern for RH is regressive.

Whether it involves busing kids thousands of miles out of their way to satisfy an outdated agenda to splitting siblings off from one another, to considering "demographics and FARM rates" as a reason to group kids together, this costly and overbearing system of busing children outside of their village needs to go.

One person mentioned that there is EVEN MORE busing available to group siblings together in after school programs.  [I take right arm, wrap it around the back of my head, and slap the left side of my face with right hand]

BTW - regarding the most recent few posts about people wanting a walkable school, I didn't see that mentioned anywhere other than the last couple of posters pretending to be arguing with an argument that doesn't exist.  It seems to be a made-up premise. Nobody is saying they want a walkable school.  They are saying they don't want their children bused many thousands of unnecessary miles out of their locality, and further split off from their siblings because of an outdated and regressive agenda.

For example our kids will also be bused nearly 6000 unnecessary miles, and we will at one point have 3 kids in 3 DIFFERENT mcps elementary schools (one of them is special needs).   That's absurd no matter how you slice it.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics