Reply to Rosemary Hills/Bethesda/CC/NCC Boundry study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Rosemary Hills/Bethesda/CC/NCC Boundry study - Superintendent's Recommendation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I think the biggest issue for E. Bethesda has always been the split articulation-- K-2 at RH and then 3-5 at BE (which is a k-5 school with an entirely different student population).  Almost everyone thinks that's a terrible pattern, and the question has been how to fix it.

A majority, but not all, of E. Bethesda residents when asked whether they would prefer to do RH/NCC (or CCES) vs. BE would say BE.  I can't vouch for everyone's motivation but generally I think the fact that it's a single school in walking distance are major reasons.  But I also think that most residents would rather have a consistent articulation pattern, no matter where it sent the kids, than have kids assigned to RH/BE.

The question of how to fix the E. Bethesda articulation pattern is separate from the question of whether the RHPS/NCC/CCES pairing is a good idea generally.  (For what it's worth, I think RHPS/NCC/CCES is a great cluster and I'm just as happy or happier being there vs. BE).
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics