Reply to Washingtonian article about Alexandria

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Washingtonian article about Alexandria"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If the walk to the entrance from where the other entrance was supposed to be is truly NBD than why aren't they building the southern entrance and saying people will just have to walk down from the north?

I'm really asking, I'm not being snarky.  Because right now it just seems like they're sticking it to the people that have already built in the south for the purposes of still enticing developers for the to be built area in the north.[/quote]

I think they found that the southern mezzanine was more expensive to build than the northern one.  [/quote]

The south mezzanine costs [b]about $10M more [/b]than the north because it had an extra ramp. [b]In the grand scheme of the project it’s a small difference. 
[/b]
The real reason is that more of the tax revenue is associated with the north and they can’t affort to lose that one. The city believes (correctly, based on data) that commercial development only happen within about 1/4-1/3 mile of the station entrance, so deleting the north mezzanine means no development of the existing shopping center and no commercial tax revenue. Not doing the south also means this, but to a smaller extent and more impacting people who are already stuck versus hypothetical future residents and businesses who can still choose not to come because they haven’t built yet.

[/quote]

Completely agreed.  Too bad it their sneakiness comes at[b] the expense of the early adopters [/b](the people in the south).  I do think though that we all need to DEMAND that the city fix the issue with the association serving people who are blind.  It is completely unacceptable that our city leaders knowingly duped them.[/quote]

They have also dropped the tax contributions toward the station of the people in PY south.  So I take it this is admission that the benefits metro access exceeded the cost of the tax contribution for those folks?  They did not say that when the contribution was discussed, IIRC. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics