Reply to Would it bother you if your child's teacher said this?

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "Would it bother you if your child's teacher said this?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pp, flashing = showing.

Children ARE immodest, unless someone teaches them otherwise.  [/quote]

No.  Both complaining about a lack of modesty and "flashing" underwear are sexual ways of talking about nonsexual behavior.  This guy is sexualizing little girls out of one side of his mouth and moaning that parents are worried he'll sexualize little girls out of the other side.  And the crazy thing is that the original post was about second graders -- still too young for these worries, but getting closer to an age where the conversation needs to happen. This guy lowered the age of the [i]immodest[/i] girls down to [b]preschool [/b]and even bragged that his kid has been in an extra layer of undershorts since she was *two* while acting like anyone who doesn't see toddlers' underwear as inherently sexual is naive.  This guy is a nut and the fact that he thinks he's the persecuted one is completely laughable.[/quote]

When I read that he had his daughter wear something under her dress since she was 2, I read that as just starting that early to establish it as a habit - so there wouldn't be battles later. I'm not sure why you jumped to sexualizing a 2 year old.  But that's just me.[/quote]

He called preschoolers immodest, inappropriately dressed for not having on a third layer of clothes, and said they were flashing him their underwear.  I'm not making a jump, I'm reading what is written.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics