Reply to DH is being accused of sexual assault.

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "DH is being accused of sexual assault."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I have a feeling everyone was drinking.  Your husband had sex that he believes was consensual. The women disagrees, was super drunk and isn't sure.  This the swabbing of multiple men.  At a minimim, he cheated on you. At a maximum, he raped this woman. Either way your marriage is pretty much over. You need a lawyer to start protecting your assets.  A court case will destroy your finances.[/quote]

I was going to look into filing. We don't have any mutual assets (we don't own property) aside from a joint bank account. We've been married less than a year. There's really no assets to protect. I have student loan debt and he has car debt but that's it.[/quote]

To be honest, if you have no kids, and you've only been married a year, I'd move on -- assuming that he at least cheated. Talk to an attorney ASAP. There may be no assets, but the woman could sue him for civil damages. [/quote] I am always amazed at how quickly women on this board proclaim that woman should kick their husbands to the curb.  So much for vows...[/quote]

I know right?  He's only hiding the fact that he's being investigated by police in multiple states for rape!  Jeez these faithless wenches, they'll jump ship over any little thing![/quote]

Questions and a swab are not an investigation. [/quote]

Yes, tracking someone who has been accused of assault down to collect physical evidence and question them is an investigation.  Possibly you're thinking of an indictment?[/quote]

I may have missed it but an investigation into an alleged assault does not constitute an investigation into an individual questioned and swabbed. It is not uncommon in cases with a victim that doesn't recall the assailant(s) to question everyone at the location during the crime to identify the assailant. [/quote]

Can't tell if you're serious or trying to get away with a non-point through semantics.  Cops from the other state tried to get hold of him and he dodged them.  Cops from his home state had to come to his house to get the physical evidence necessary for the investigation.  He was questioned and swabbed as part of an investigation, as were all of the other people who were swabbed.  The fact that he's not the only person being investigated doesn't mean he's not being investigated.  And if he had nothing to hide he's sure being strange in showing it -- hiding from the police and hiding the fact that the police are looking for him from his wife.

But back to the point, something about how OP is a monster because it should be totally par for the course to be blindsided by a rape allegation and then have the husband who went out of his way to hide it from you act like it's no big deal.  Sometimes it's fascinating to see how far people will bend to stick to the "whoever represents my gender in this story must be the aggrieved party" line.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics