Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Washington Post Article - Disability "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The article mentioned a relationship with on man, himself disabled. I think the father of the twins? And another man, who was getting married to someone else. Could have been three different fathers. Do NOT understand why she wasn't using implanted hormone birth control after the first pregnancy.[/quote] because republicans have made it clear that birth control is wrong and shouldn't be funded by the govt. Instead they would rather waste billion on these ding dongs who keep having babies. [/quote] All children are age 10 and under. There were PLENTY of BC options for these folks and they were still breeding like viruses. You don't understand the core - they live off these kids. Mimic china and panish people with $$$$$ for having, say, third child, they will find $25 for BC of pocket right away - even very very poor ones. Has nothing to do with trump.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
