Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]its just ridiculious reading what age guy writes because its all so obvious that his end goal is older players (36 months older) playing against correct age players. Always looking to steal accomplishments from younger players.[/quote] No one is pushing for 36 month age groupings. You’re the only one pushing for kids to play up based on grade. 12 months is it. Anyone who wants to play up can if they are able and the club will allow it.[/quote] If play downs / holdbacks are allowed they will be potentially 36 months older than the youngest correct grade player. This is because HS allows players to be held back 2 times.[/quote] Fear mongering alert. Going with a 12 month age window for league play solves this, whoops already done. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
