Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Anyone get telework approved at SEC?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.[/quote] I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.[/quote] Assume a manager allows his staff to telework twice per PP (different days). Tell me a realistic story of how that would result in any repercussions⦠Who tattle tells on the manager? Who tells the manager to stop? What if the manager persists anyway? Does this story end with RV firing PA and sending markets into a tailspin? The manager is fired or placed on a PIP? Play it out for meā¦[/quote] At least for us in CF they have put out concrete guidance. Must have a situation that prevents the employee from coming to work (dr. aapointment) and a critical business need to work that day (i.e. an urgent deadline). Most people are not able to meet the critical need prong and are not allowed to TW. For us, the SK-17 would overrule the SK-15 if they were to allow an employee to TW.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics