Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its interesting that CF, which had the most liberal TW policy in which people were trusted to work remotely for decades, is the only division that has implemented a clear rule that outlines the high bar for telework. Meanwhile other people get weeks off for child care issues (yes, true story!) Glad I'm no longer in CF.
I agree it is odd that we went from having the most liberal to the most restrictive TW policy. You're sort of right on EST for childcare. While no one in CF was able to get it for childcare some people in other divisions were able to get it if their SOs were willing to advocate for it. Unfortunately in CF the SOs were not willing to fight for anyone to get it.
Lost a lot of respect for our acting CF director.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its interesting that CF, which had the most liberal TW policy in which people were trusted to work remotely for decades, is the only division that has implemented a clear rule that outlines the high bar for telework. Meanwhile other people get weeks off for child care issues (yes, true story!) Glad I'm no longer in CF.
I agree it is odd that we went from having the most liberal to the most restrictive TW policy. You're sort of right on EST for childcare. While no one in CF was able to get it for childcare some people in other divisions were able to get it if their SOs were willing to advocate for it. Unfortunately in CF the SOs were not willing to fight for anyone to get it.
Anonymous wrote:Its interesting that CF, which had the most liberal TW policy in which people were trusted to work remotely for decades, is the only division that has implemented a clear rule that outlines the high bar for telework. Meanwhile other people get weeks off for child care issues (yes, true story!) Glad I'm no longer in CF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.
I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.
Assume a manager allows his staff to telework twice per PP (different days). Tell me a realistic story of how that would result in any repercussions…
Who tattle tells on the manager? Who tells the manager to stop? What if the manager persists anyway?
Does this story end with RV firing PA and sending markets into a tailspin? The manager is fired or placed on a PIP? Play it out for me…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.
I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.
Assume a manager allows his staff to telework twice per PP (different days). Tell me a realistic story of how that would result in any repercussions…
Who tattle tells on the manager? Who tells the manager to stop? What if the manager persists anyway?
Does this story end with RV firing PA and sending markets into a tailspin? The manager is fired or placed on a PIP? Play it out for me…
People talk. Soon employees in other offices find out and complain that it isn’t fair. Then the manager could be threatened to lose their job.
Yeah, the problem with this story is that the current “policy” is so vague analogous that the manager isn’t doing anything wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.
I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.
Assume a manager allows his staff to telework twice per PP (different days). Tell me a realistic story of how that would result in any repercussions…
Who tattle tells on the manager? Who tells the manager to stop? What if the manager persists anyway?
Does this story end with RV firing PA and sending markets into a tailspin? The manager is fired or placed on a PIP? Play it out for me…
People talk. Soon employees in other offices find out and complain that it isn’t fair. Then the manager could be threatened to lose their job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.
I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.
Assume a manager allows his staff to telework twice per PP (different days). Tell me a realistic story of how that would result in any repercussions…
Who tattle tells on the manager? Who tells the manager to stop? What if the manager persists anyway?
Does this story end with RV firing PA and sending markets into a tailspin? The manager is fired or placed on a PIP? Play it out for me…
People talk. Soon employees in other offices find out and complain that it isn’t fair. Then the manager could be threatened to lose their job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.
I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.
Assume a manager allows his staff to telework twice per PP (different days). Tell me a realistic story of how that would result in any repercussions…
Who tattle tells on the manager? Who tells the manager to stop? What if the manager persists anyway?
Does this story end with RV firing PA and sending markets into a tailspin? The manager is fired or placed on a PIP? Play it out for me…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.
I mean aren't we full time RTO now? What would change? As for ad hoc - some groups have it but many divisions for all practical purposes do not bc their timekeepers say no. That's why most people are burning 7 hours of leave bc they have a 1 hr doctors appt or meeting at their kid's school or whatever. If they get rid of ad hoc altogether - fantastic, hope for a snowy winter.
Anonymous wrote:Any word on whether SEC will be implementing full time RTO without ad hoc capabilities? There was that rumor, but then no announcements on Friday.