Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "The Blind Side scandal"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not sure why people are defending the Tuohys when legal experts say there doesn’t appear to be a reason for it. https://x.com/phil_lewis_/status/1692152975760785449?s=46&t=a6K0qHt7Ze4ws-p2MKUF8A[/quote] Everyone “defending” them here has said they might be jerks AND it was a mutually beneficial relationship. That’s just too much nuance for an Internet forum apparently.[/quote] Nothing mutually beneficial in the conservatorship. There was an extreme advantage to the Tuohys and they were terrible conservators. They didn’t even do their basic annual filing of finances. Even the Spears family had the sense to do the money filing. [/quote] They didn’t use it. So he can sue them for being jerks I guess? But he doesn’t seem to have suffered by playing for an incredible pro team and making millions. [/quote] They’ve used his NIL constantly for the past 20 years to promote themselves. [/quote] Is she not allowed to talk about her experience? She was there too.[/quote] The weird ass and unethical conservatorship they’ve had on him for nearly 20 years allows them to use his NIL. But he’s within his right to ask the court to revoke it [b]and further bar the family from using his NIL[/b]. [/quote] This would be an unconstitutional restriction of their 1A rights. It would never ever ever EVER happen. Ever. [/quote] The Tuohy's are lying about Michael being adopted. I definitely think a judge can prevent them from making money spreading a harmful lie. He was never adopted. [/quote] Lies are protected by 1A and it isn’t a defamatory claim so, no. You’re just wrong. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics