Reply to ECNL moving to school year part 2

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues  will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.[/quote]
Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?[/quote]
Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.[/quote]

Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases. 
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.[/quote]
So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using [b]GRADUATING YEAR[/b]?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts

[/quote]

Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….[/quote]
Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?[/quote]

I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman. [/quote]
So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle [b]better aligns with school calendars,[/b] supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”[/quote]Yeah, he's the Age guy. Along with ECNL leads and as it turns out teams in the DMV.[/quote]
I wouldnt be surprised if Tom Condone was the age guy. Not bright + arrogant, seems to fit.[/quote]
Also because hes fighting so hard against Aug players playing on teams that are their grade in school. Which would translate into all players during games being the same grade at showcases. Negates the need to do GY. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics