Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 20:05     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle better aligns with school calendars, supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”
Yeah, he's the Age guy. Along with ECNL leads and as it turns out teams in the DMV.

I wouldnt be surprised if Tom Condone was the age guy. Not bright + arrogant, seems to fit.
Someone seems jealous that they don't get to make their own rules for youth soccer.

Jealous? I dont think you know what that word means.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 20:03     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle better aligns with school calendars, supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”
Yeah, he's the Age guy. Along with ECNL leads and as it turns out teams in the DMV.

I wouldnt be surprised if Tom Condone was the age guy. Not bright + arrogant, seems to fit.

Also because hes fighting so hard against Aug players playing on teams that are their grade in school. Which would translate into all players during games being the same grade at showcases. Negates the need to do GY.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 20:02     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle better aligns with school calendars, supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”
Yeah, he's the Age guy. Along with ECNL leads and as it turns out teams in the DMV.

I wouldnt be surprised if Tom Condone was the age guy. Not bright + arrogant, seems to fit.
Someone seems jealous that they don't get to make their own rules for youth soccer.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 20:00     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?
For just showcases, it wouldn't be much of a change. They wouldn't need a big amount of lead time.

It would be a huge change.

As an example how do you just plan to label the levels? Cant call them u12 u13 u14 u15 u16 anymore.
Easy, set up a names committee. Have them meet weekly and within about 6 weeks, problem solved.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 19:59     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle better aligns with school calendars, supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”
Yeah, he's the Age guy. Along with ECNL leads and as it turns out teams in the DMV.

I wouldnt be surprised if Tom Condone was the age guy. Not bright + arrogant, seems to fit.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 19:54     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?
For just showcases, it wouldn't be much of a change. They wouldn't need a big amount of lead time.

It would be a huge change.

As an example how do you just plan to label the levels? Cant call them u12 u13 u14 u15 u16 anymore.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 19:42     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?
For just showcases, it wouldn't be much of a change. They wouldn't need a big amount of lead time.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 19:41     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle better aligns with school calendars, supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”
Yeah, he's the Age guy. Along with ECNL leads and as it turns out teams in the DMV.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 19:36     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

This is for next fall when SY starts.

11v11 = U18/U19 = 8/1/2007 + younger = Senior
11v11 = U17 = 8/1/2009 + younger = Junior
11v11 = U16 = 8/1/2010 + younger = Sophmore
11v11 = U15 = 8/1/2011 + younger = Freshman
11v11 = U14 = 8/1/2012 + younger = 8th grade
11v11 = U13 = 8/1/2013 + younger = 7th grade
11v11 = U12 = 8/1/2014 + younger = 6th grade
9v9 = U11 = 8/1/2015 + younger = 5th grade
9v9 = U10 = 8/1/2016 + younger = 4th grade
7v7 = U9 = 8/1/2017 + younger = 3rd grade
7v7 = U8 = 8/1/2018 + younger = 2nd grade
4v4 = U7 = 8/1/2019 + younger = 1st grade
4v4 = U6 = 8/1/2020 + younger = kindergarten
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 18:29     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So this is the guy pushing for play downs?

https://www.usyouthsoccer.org/news/2025/06/10/updated-decision-on-age-group-formation/

US Youth Soccer CEO Tom Condone addressed the adjustment to the registration process: “At US Youth Soccer, our mission is to support the development of every player. After careful collaboration with our partners and listening to our membership, we believe this shift to an August 1 player formation cycle better aligns with school calendars, supports social and individual needs, and ultimately enhances the youth soccer experience for families across the country.”
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 18:23     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.

So you heard it from the guy who put together "New Comp" the NPL ECRL thing that nobody can figure out?

Let me guess allowing play downs is his Hail Mary to making USYS events somehow relevant?

Give me a break.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 17:45     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


Does MLSN pay extra insurance? You’re such a dork. U19 for all of youth soccer next year will include Aug 2007s to July 2009s that almost a two year difference. So it makes sense to break those kids up and play with your grade for junior/senior year showcase.

Yes they would have to pay extra insurance if showcases went from a 12 month to a 36 month variance of players.

2/3 more risk of players getting injured.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 17:30     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


Does MLSN pay extra insurance? You’re such a dork. U19 for all of youth soccer next year will include Aug 2007s to July 2009s that almost a two year difference. So it makes sense to break those kids up and play with your grade for junior/senior year showcase.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 17:27     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?


I heard from Tom Condone the CEO of USYS. It’s not for me to consider I’m not making any decisions. If you don’t like it write to your local congressman.
Anonymous
Post 03/03/2026 15:45     Subject: ECNL moving to school year part 2

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like age guy is working overtime to pimp playing down again.

Biobanding works with MLS because they are acadamies. Allowing play downs in p2p leagues will bankrupt multiple clubs. Nobody wants to play against a cheater 3 years older then they are.

Don't worry I see it as well.

Just throwing this out there but how does the u15, u16, u17 naming convention work when players are allowed to play down?

Maybe something like u15+2, u16+2, u17+2? Or does u15 become u17, u16 become u18, u17 become u19, etc?

Hahahahaha I never thought about that.

Allowing players 1-2 years older to play down is the same thing as forcing younger players play 1-2 years up.


Stop commenting to yourself.
They’d call it 2027, 2028, 2029s….
Or like MLSN just call it the age group it is but allow the players in the same grade to join the group for showcases.
MLSN doesn’t change the name of its ages based of biobanding players joining the group.

So to accommodate play downs leagues will just stop using the u16 u17 u18 etc system and start using GRADUATING YEAR?

Hahahahaha

But you are the guy trying to tell people that graduating year aka grade in school doesnt exist in club soccer. I guess it does exist when you want play downs to be involved.

The hypocrisy is off the charts



Different guy. Also I have no idea what they will call it? But I heard straight from the source that high level showcases and tournaments will allow older kids to play with their grade. I do not know any specifics other than that.

We shall see….

Maybe you heard a rumor but theres so much more that would need to happen behind something like that before it was even considered.

Its like saying you heard a rumor that NASCAR is going to allow Formula One cars for some events this year. Theres just so many reasons why even if people really want to see something like that happen that it cant happen.

Have you even considered the liability insurance leagues would have to pay in addition to whats already being paid?