Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Palestinians Starving - What Can We Do?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Former Israeli MK Moshe Feiglin and member Netanyahu's Likud party, states the following:[b] "Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy. The enemy is not Hamas... We need to conquer Gaza and colonize it and not leave a single Gazan child there. There is no other victory."[/b] https://x.com/QudsNen/status/1924823111230230814[/quote] This is sick. This is what zionism is. How the hell does anyone stand by Israel? [/quote] I mean, I don’t agree with what is happening, but they aren’t wrong that Gazan children will grow up to hate Israelis and are effectively “the enemy.”[/quote] I mean, did Jewish survivors of the Holocaust grow up to love the Nazis? Do vile things, and people will hate you. It's not incomprehensible nor nonsensical. [/quote] But that is also why the Israelis hate Hamas in the first place. It’s a viscous cycle. I can see why a Gazan child is a potential Hamas soldier to them. And I can understand why Gazans feel the same about Israeli children. [/quote] This reminds me of a statement made in the Nuremberg trials regarding killing children. It is similar to rhetoric amongst some Israelis to justify the death of children in Gaza: Q: Will you explain to the tribunal [b]what conceivable threat[/b] to the security of the Wehrmacht (Nazi forces) [b]a child[/b] constituted in your judgment? Q: Will you agree there that there was[b] absolutely no rational basis for killing children except genocide and killing children[/b]? A: "... to achieve a security but also a [b]permanent security[/b] because for that reason the [b]children were people who would grow up and surely being the children of parents who had been killed they would constitute a danger no smaller than that of the parents[/b]."[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics