Reply to Feedback on Next Level Lacrosse?

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "Feedback on Next Level Lacrosse?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nice try, their 2023 B team already has 20 players and no one would pay to play on a B team with 35 players. Also nice try with the high school recruiting angle. Just because you have 29 players doesn't mean you'll get more college recruits, only a certain amount of kids can get real play time with that large of a roster. And their 2024 team has 28 players and that's not a "sophomore+" team worried about recruiting. Also their other high school A teams have 26 players, not 29. That's a big difference in lax and almost $9,000 in NL's pockets.

The 2028s have 24 kids on the roster and they're no where near high school and recruiting.

Money, Money, Money.[/quote]

9k per team -7k in expenses.
2k per team for the owners. That’s literally nothing for a full time job working as a coach to a bunch of Millionaires.

Would you want your child’s teacher to be making 20-30k a year? Neither would I. [/quote]

Expenses per team would be essentially fixed. The incremental cost for an extra kid on the roster would be virtually zero so prior poster was more right about the money.

As far as roster sizes, if NL is *relatively* honest (let’s be real, ML/DCE wouldn’t be any more) about playing time philosophy, then the parents and kids go into it with eyes wide open and can choose to spend their money as they see fit.

I’m guessing most of the college players buried deep on those 40-50 man rosters are still happy they got to be part of those teams. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics