Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Places to Sign Recall Petitions - Tholen/Omeish/Cohen"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The bloodlust of this subset of Dranesville folks who didn’t get their way is scary. I think she’s doing a fine job during really bad times. Not just the pandemic but the radicalization of some in the community. She seems kind and like she totally does the work. I disagreed with her TJ vote and I think more should have been done to help the McLean overcrowding but I don’t always get what I want. And I watched how some in the McLean community came after her about the boundary and it was scary.[/quote] So easy for you to say, since it sounds like it did not negatively impact your child. If everyone in Dranesville watched her lying, flip-flopping, double talk, and manipulation on the boundary, she would get zero votes in 2023. What's worse, MHS is at 100% capacity with the new, temporary building, so it did not need a boundary change. AND the boundary change only moves about 140 kids/year over three years. According to FCPS numbers, this does NOT change MHS capacity at all - ZERO change. So the boundary change did nothing to address capacity at MHS AND she did not get MHS a bond on the most recent CIP, so no reno coming. Failure after failure after failure. And this is only on one issue. [/quote] Actually, she has fixed the capacity issue - at least temporarily. Mclean was projected to be at 123% of capacity over the next 5 years prior to the boundary change and modular. And she eliminated a split feeder at Colvin run, which is something Janie Strauss had been promising for years. The school board did not follow gatehouse recommendations, but they did follow the community committee recommendations on the boundary change. Which one do you think did more actual research? Yep - the unpaid community committee. She has failed in multiple other ways, along with the rest of the board. Schools online for a year, focusing on admissions of one school and renaming schools while school buildings were shuttered. Crazy surveys and expensive studies. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics