Reply to YouTube Influencer Myka Stauffer "rehomes" adopted son

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "YouTube Influencer Myka Stauffer "rehomes" adopted son"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.

Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!

Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.

They failed miserably at this.

I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right. [/quote]

Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.[/quote]

No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't.  It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.

Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process.  I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision.  If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find.  But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.  [/quote]

Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.

The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics