Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's allegedly now a investigation going on as to where he is. Not sure if he is considered a missing person. This is heartbreaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlHnGz-z01Q
This lady is literally psycho and is making it her life mission to ruin this family. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Why are we still talking about this? A lot more going on in the world right now then a family who re homed a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
This is rehoming:
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.
Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.
The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....
I mean this
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
But that's not adoption.
Yes, it can be. Sometimes kids are just placed with a POA and sometimes those new families adopt. It is when there is a second adoption involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's allegedly now a investigation going on as to where he is. Not sure if he is considered a missing person. This is heartbreaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlHnGz-z01Q
This lady is literally psycho and is making it her life mission to ruin this family. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Why are we still talking about this? A lot more going on in the world right now then a family who re homed a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's allegedly now a investigation going on as to where he is. Not sure if he is considered a missing person. This is heartbreaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlHnGz-z01Q
This lady is literally psycho and is making it her life mission to ruin this family. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Why are we still talking about this? A lot more going on in the world right now then a family who re homed a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's allegedly now a investigation going on as to where he is. Not sure if he is considered a missing person. This is heartbreaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlHnGz-z01Q
This lady is literally psycho and is making it her life mission to ruin this family. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Why are we still talking about this? A lot more going on in the world right now then a family who re homed a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
This is rehoming:
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.
Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.
The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....
I mean this
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
But that's not adoption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.
Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.
The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....
Anonymous wrote:There's allegedly now a investigation going on as to where he is. Not sure if he is considered a missing person. This is heartbreaking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlHnGz-z01Q
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
This is rehoming:
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.
Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.
The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....
I mean this
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
This is rehoming:
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.
Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.
The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
This is rehoming:
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/adoption/#article/part1
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.
Rehoming does not equate w/the term adoption.
As an adopted child, I can never claim that I was rehomed as a baby.
The term rehoming typically refers to animals, household pets I think....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First of all, they are using the term “rehoming” like they have given their pet dog or cat a new home.
I have never heard the term rehoming in regards to a child.
Second, would they rehome one of their biological children if they had a special need later on?
Or would that put them in jail??!
Finally choosing to be a parent requires an initial commitment + promise of unconditional love.
1000%.
They failed miserably at this.
I am ecstatic that her endorsement deals are dropping her left & right.
Rehoming is an adoption term for kids.
No, as a parent of adopted children, it really isn't. It's only a term used for the gray semi-legal area where you send your kids off to live with a stranger with no background checks.
Placing a child for adoption, disrupting an adoption, re-adoption. These are terms used for the legal process. I hope that this family used the legal process, that they signed paperwork to terminate their rights, and that Huxley is now in the custody of a family with a complete homestudy and social worker supervision. If that's true, and their mistake was using the wrong word, that's find. But "rehoming" is generally not used for that legal process.