Reply to Commander in Chief Forum

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Commander in Chief Forum"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.[/quote]

The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.

Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email. [/quote]

THANK YOU..

I would assume the government would have a more secure system to distribute the truly important secrets. Like, not email. She'd have a person to brief her on all that.

I don't have or understand security clearance, though I do know there are many different levels. Hillary was just trying to circumvent the FOIA b/c she wanted the freedom to email without constantly thinking public vs private in the present. The optics aren't good, but she's always been very protective of her privacy. She erred on the wrong side of this...and I am sure she gets that. CAN WE MOVE ON?
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics