Anonymous
09/08/2016 06:26
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Not sure if anyone has posted this but jic it hasn't been, or someone has a real interest in reading this, here is the link to the FBI report.
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
Thank you.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 23:20
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:President Trump.
Say it again.
President Trump.
Build the wall (and make them pay for it). And make America great again! God bless.
He has taken his naive useful idiots for a ride. He is not deporting anyone other than criminals ,same as what Obama is doing. Congress will not allow budget for the stupid wall even if trump actually wants one. Do Trumpkins know President doesnt control the purse nor can pass bills?
Wait a minute, you mean Barrack was wrong to do the above during the past eight years? And where the hell did he get that 1.7 billion he gave to Iran from his stash?
Anonymous
09/07/2016 23:14
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:President Trump.
Say it again.
President Trump.
Build the wall (and make them pay for it). And make America great again! God bless.
He has taken his naive useful idiots for a ride. He is not deporting anyone other than criminals ,same as what Obama is doing. Congress will not allow budget for the stupid wall even if trump actually wants one. Do Trumpkins know President doesnt control the purse nor can pass bills?
Anonymous
09/07/2016 23:05
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG, blaming Trump's bumbling on Matt Lauer is laughable.
You're so used to seeing slick lawyers bullshit you with poll-tested consultant-written soundbites that you forgot how a normal person talks. Hillary is a robot - a warhawk salivating for conflict with Russian/Iran/China.
We don't want normal or avg person as President. We want someone lot smarter than average. The average person will never have beer with the president so that shouldn't be a criterion. Trump was bumbling idiot. He was no better than most trumpkins and that's bad.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 22:44
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Trump came across as more genuine and as a leader who will listen to those around him with military expertise.
Clinton came across as arrogant and as a person who has all the answers. I don’t like the “answers” she has had in the past. Don’t trust her for our future.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is sexism.
Nope. It is Hillary Clinton. It is who she is. Sorry you can’t see that. She has been like this her whole life, as far as I can tell. Listening to the audio of her relating her experience as an attorney getting a light sentence for a rapist.... first lady..... SoS...... she has always come across as arrogant.
Hillary is a misanthrope - it's why she had to ride charismatic alpha dog Slick Willie's coattails her entire adult whole life. He's everything she isn't.
[/i]mis·an·thrope
(noun)
a person who dislikes humankind and avoids human society.[i]
Anonymous
09/07/2016 22:41
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.
The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.
Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.
Well, we know that she had instructed one of her aides to remove classified headers on a fax and send it unsecured. Bet she had the same instructions to her staff - and so she's sticking with the "no header" excuse. None of this would be an issue if she hadn't set up the secret unsecured server in the first place.
Stop trying to rewrite history. Do you even understand the meaning of "nonpaper."
Anonymous
09/07/2016 22:33
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
The highest clearance I ever had was Secret, and I am pretty sure that I would have known that even with a Secret clearance that no one should be sharing possible drone targets with me. If she didn't know that was classified, there is something VERY wrong.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 22:08
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.
She still does not understand classified information should be stored in classified system not in her basement on a public and non-secure network. The two system does not connect because they are on two different network.
Yup. And the reason the classified info didn't have classified headers is because she told her staff to remove classified headers before sending to her home server. As if that would make it OK.
And the lies just keep getting more ridiculous....
At least three emails have a portion marking for confidential classified information. She can't use the lack of header excuse. As SOS, she is required to identify classified information without relying on headers. The reason some of them don't have headers is because she was using a home grown server and not a proper government system.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 22:01
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Not sure if anyone has posted this but jic it hasn't been, or someone has a real interest in reading this, here is the link to the FBI report.
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
Anonymous
09/07/2016 21:47
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.
She still does not understand classified information should be stored in classified system not in her basement on a public and non-secure network. The two system does not connect because they are on two different network.
Yup. And the reason the classified info didn't have classified headers is because she told her staff to remove classified headers before sending to her home server. As if that would make it OK.
And the lies just keep getting more ridiculous....
It's been proven that she told her aide to remove the classified markings from a fax and send it unsecured. That right there would have cost a low-level Marine his job.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 21:42
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I crazy or did Trump say that Putin was a better leader than Obama?
...he is. Without question.
I will say that Putin is a leader of a country I would never want to live in, but he has a way of getting what he wants. He has an agenda, and he succeeds in fulfilling his agenda. His agenda is not our agenda.
Sometimes I feel like the USA has become the 90-lb. weakling that has sand kicked in his face at the beach by Russia, Iran, and other bullies.
Putin gets what he wants by being a dictator and using political police to silence his opponents. You know, by murdering them. Is that what you are striving for?
No. But, I also don’t expect our leader to apologize to our enemies and make concessions. Obama is viewed as weak by leaders of other countries. That is why Iran is toying with our ships and Russia is buzzing our planes. I don’t think HRC will be any better.
HRC is definitely more of a hawk than Obama. Trump on the other hand will be easily goaded into blunder after blunder. Putin already knows how to yank his chain. Wouldn't be long before they all know how.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 21:42
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.
She still does not understand classified information should be stored in classified system not in her basement on a public and non-secure network. The two system does not connect because they are on two different network.
Yup. And the reason the classified info didn't have classified headers is because she told her staff to remove classified headers before sending to her home server. As if that would make it OK.
And the lies just keep getting more ridiculous....
Anonymous
09/07/2016 21:41
Subject: Re:Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She keeps saying classified material has a header in order for it to be classified. That's incorrect. Classified material is such by virtue of its content,whether marked or unmarked. Hillary signed a document saying she recognized that.
The issue is classified info being on a low-side server at all, though... Classified information shouldn't be in a state.gov email either, it's not a secure classified environment. So, issues with classification aren't the same as issues with her private server, which most people find objectionable because it seems like a way to conceal information from FOIA, which is kind of the exact opposite problem.
Also, I'm pretty sure the classified info was sent TO her, which I don't think you can really fault her for. And it was inconsistently marked and some of the stuff that was marked wasn't actually classified etc etc. I think the classification stuff is mostly a false flag. Talk about FOIA concerns if you want to hit her on email.
THANK YOU..
I would assume the government would have a more secure system to distribute the truly important secrets. Like, not email. She'd have a person to brief her on all that.
I don't have or understand security clearance, though I do know there are many different levels. Hillary was just trying to circumvent the FOIA b/c she wanted the freedom to email without constantly thinking public vs private in the present. The optics aren't good, but she's always been very protective of her privacy. She erred on the wrong side of this...and I am sure she gets that. CAN WE MOVE ON?
Anonymous
09/07/2016 21:39
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Sorry: it was Bush who weakened America by sending US troops to Iraq, pushing a withdrawal of financial regulation/oversight and alienating almost every ally we had except the Saudis and the Japanese. Took his eye off the Middle East in the first year and there was Condi as NSA in over her head and unable to set any direction. Ideology was more important than reality in foreign policy.
Anonymous
09/07/2016 21:39
Subject: Commander in Chief Forum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I crazy or did Trump say that Putin was a better leader than Obama?
...he is. Without question.
I will say that Putin is a leader of a country I would never want to live in, but he has a way of getting what he wants. He has an agenda, and he succeeds in fulfilling his agenda. His agenda is not our agenda.
Sometimes I feel like the USA has become the 90-lb. weakling that has sand kicked in his face at the beach by Russia, Iran, and other bullies.
Putin gets what he wants by being a dictator and using political police to silence his opponents. You know, by murdering them. Is that what you are striving for?
No. But, I also don’t expect our leader to apologize to our enemies and make concessions. Obama is viewed as weak by leaders of other countries. That is why Iran is toying with our ships and Russia is buzzing our planes. I don’t think HRC will be any better.
She's a warhawk. I wish she wasn't, I wish she was more like Obama, cautious and tending towards isolationist. But Trump or Clinton, that time is passed.