Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan New York City
Reply to "College placements"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Brearley having another banger year. [/quote] How are the completely unconnected kids doing[/quote] Right. One reason why MIT matriculation seems salient is that they do not consider legacy in admissions. So 25 girls to Harvard over 5 years is difficult to read in terms of the unconnected success indication, whereas only one (1) MIT matriculation (and also only 1 to Caltech, another legacy blind, though much smaller, school) gives you pause, at least if you have a STEM-oriented kid -- which we do.[/quote] I can’t speak for students at these schools as I’ve never attended. But if a student loves the liberal arts focused curriculum at a place like Brearley, Trinity or Collegiate, a place like MIT would not be as appealing. Saying this as an alum of MIT. [/quote] I agree with this, and I made this point further up thread and on another thread where someone else brought up the lack of MIT at NYC TT private schools. My DD is at one of these SS girls schools, and I’ve never heard her or her friends and classmates even mention MIT. For whatever reason, it’s not on their radar as far as schools they’d like to attend.[/quote] Spence had 4 girls going to MIT over 5 years . It is still a small number but it is 4 times higher than Brearley (1 over 5 years) [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics