Anonymous wrote:These comments are insane. The vast majority of posters here and their children would never get into any of the colleges listed, including UChicago. MIT wouldn’t even waste their time reading thru the entire app.
The one sensible takeaway from this thread is that there’s a cap on how many kids from each high school a college will take. I know one kid who transferred from Dalton to Poly Prep and another one who transferred from HM to Friends, each for their senior year, to sidestep the Duke cap from their original schools.
Anonymous wrote:The thing about Hunter is that even the people who go there and like it tend to say that it's a pretty normal school teaching-wise - with the same mix of good/bad teachers as any public school - and just happens to have a lot of incredibly bright kids.
Anonymous wrote:Hunter matriculations from last year look pretty good, 8 to Harvard, 4 to Princeton, lots of other great schools. It's only slightly larger than HM and I am assuming far fewer legacies.
https://www.instagram.com/hawkscommit25/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Brearley having another banger year.
How are the completely unconnected kids doing
Right. One reason why MIT matriculation seems salient is that they do not consider legacy in admissions. So 25 girls to Harvard over 5 years is difficult to read in terms of the unconnected success indication, whereas only one (1) MIT matriculation (and also only 1 to Caltech, another legacy blind, though much smaller, school) gives you pause, at least if you have a STEM-oriented kid -- which we do.
I can’t speak for students at these schools as I’ve never attended. But if a student loves the liberal arts focused curriculum at a place like Brearley, Trinity or Collegiate, a place like MIT would not be as appealing. Saying this as an alum of MIT.
I agree with this, and I made this point further up thread and on another thread where someone else brought up the lack of MIT at NYC TT private schools. My DD is at one of these SS girls schools, and I’ve never heard her or her friends and classmates even mention MIT. For whatever reason, it’s not on their radar as far as schools they’d like to attend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The one sensible takeaway from this thread is that there’s a cap on how many kids from each high school a college will take. I know one kid who transferred from Dalton to Poly Prep and another one who transferred from HM to Friends, each for their senior year, to sidestep the Duke cap from their original schools.
Public-school-wise, if you're wondering why someone would rank Brooklyn Latin or High School for American Studies over one of the big three... this is why.
Anonymous wrote:The one sensible takeaway from this thread is that there’s a cap on how many kids from each high school a college will take. I know one kid who transferred from Dalton to Poly Prep and another one who transferred from HM to Friends, each for their senior year, to sidestep the Duke cap from their original schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of schools are dropping or de-emphasizing legacy admissions, it's not just MIT; I suspect that explains some - but not all - of the recent decline in fortunes at HM for example, which is positively riddled with Ivy parents.
I think it’s legacy + $$$ that helps. Horace Mann may have legacy but fewer big development cases. I know Spence has a lot of big money, at least one person posted is the grandchild of a notable billionaire.