Reply to Erin Burnett's new hair looks terrible

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Erin Burnett's new hair looks terrible"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Her natural coloring is dark brown/ black hair and light blue eyes. The fake tan and brassy light brown are an affront to her natural coloring. She looks terrible with a tan ( which is surely fake because Irish skin goes straight to sunburn).

The permanent frown she always has just makes it worse.  She makes a million dollars a year and can feign interest for a few hours without scowling.[/quote]

I have blue eyes and her naturally dark hair.  It’s how I look best.  I’m Irish/Italian and I tan very, very easily (don’t burn), but I can get more fair in the winter.

Now that I’m 50- the dark hair is even more important than that brassy in between color a lot of women go to with age because somebody told them you need to go lighter older.  It’s not true for everyone.  Sandra Bullock and Angelina look awful lighter- as blondes.  [/quote]

DP.  Completely agree.  I'm a very fair-skinned brunette - dark brown hair, almost black - and would look terrible if I went lighter.  I did consider it a few times, but keep coming back to the fact that I just look better with very dark hair.  My skin tone is "cool" and any warmth around my face makes me look sick and sallow.  I honestly can't think of one naturally brunette actress who looked better after going lighter.[/quote]

Yep. Jennifer Connelly is another one that looks awful blonde.  [/quote]

+1
Rose Byrne, Megan Fox, Dua Lipa, Eiza Gonzalez, Selena Gomez, Lucy Hale... all look so much better with their natural brunette hair.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics